You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #33: No, no, you forgot the 2nd independent source who confirmed the story... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. No, no, you forgot the 2nd independent source who confirmed the story...
The one who told the Washington Post, that Fordham and Palmer did have a meeting. The second source was from Hastert's office, so it is highly likely he knew what he was talking about. The only thing that second source wouldn't know is the bit about Hastert being told by Palmer.

So if Fordham isn't lying about having the meeting with Palmer, why would he lie about the fact Hastert knew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC