You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #37: indeed. in military speak AOS [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
37. indeed. in military speak AOS
all options suck. it WOULD have been better just to leave sadaam. putting him back isn't gonna work now. sigh. can't let iran have iWaq. and then there's turkey and the kurds.
what in the hell were the PNACers thinking????
iWaq is gonna end up with Sadr as the new sadaam with the added iyatollah twist of religion. this is just gonna be a fucking mess for decades because of georgie's oedipal snit.

what is the answer? maybe dropping the people who thought this idea was good outside the green zone, like feeding virgins to the volcano.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC