Reply #72: Your argument is full of shit. You're making crap up to support a failed premise. [View All]

[MADem]

Rangel isn't planning on "rounding up young people protesting the war in (your) city." Lame, dumb assertion. The pal of your buddies Rush and Dildo, the Dunce, he still has his veto pen. No law will be passed without the express consent of the GOP. So stop putting this shit on Rangel. Now that the Democrats have the majority, they also have the soapbox. That's the big difference. Get with reality.

I DO see where this is going. Let me spell it out for you:

Any law passed, assuming one is, will have the imprimatur of fairness at its center. No loopholes for the rich, the famous, the wealthy. EVERYONE gets an "opportunity to excel."

I never said there was "no difference" between "draft and volunteer." That came out of some musty corner of YOUR own head.

Stop extrapolating and frankly, making stuff up, in an effort to rescue a horrible argument. Give it up. And go watch F/911 for a little recent history on our AVF. It's a good refresher in Military Recruitment Reality and would benefit your perspective on the issue.

If you're really worried about the draft, and just not earnestly expressing vague concerns to excite people, go picket the White House and tell Bush to bring our kids home, instead of posting about how mean Charlie Rangel, all by himself, is being towards you and yours.