Reply #15: That scenario is (nearly) constitutional -- within the "consent of the governed" [View All]

[Senator]

I only say "nearly" because no action since the election theft has been legitimate, therefore it follows that none of the bushkid's appointments carry legitimacy.

However, impeachment is a protection against the "present danger" the regime continues to pose to the nation. And since any replacement would now have to be approved by a "non-one-party" congress, that VP-then-P would carry the legitimate approval of the people.

I wouldn't pose, or expect, any significant level of objection.

But "the result" remains irrelevant to the moral, patriotic duty to impeach.

The chips can fall where they may. It's that important -- and non-partisan.

--