You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #58: And sometimes lack of transparency means just that, lack of transparency [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #45
58. And sometimes lack of transparency means just that, lack of transparency
Which is something which most experts agree is lacking in MBS'
<http://www.securitiesarbitration.com/subprime-investments.php>
<http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/examinations/supervisory/insights/sisum08/article01_transparency.html> This is an especially good one
Even the Chairman of the FDIC agrees that there is a lack of transparency throughout the system
<http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=post&forum=389&topic_id=4141423&mesg_id=4143376>

When you have major experts, both inside and outside of government agreeing that there is a lack of transparency, I tend to take their word over that of an anonymous, biased internet poster. Even though he does have some interesting lists. Speaking of which, nowhere in those lists did I see one word or figure concerning whether or not the borrower have the means to pay back those mortgages. Hmmm, looks a bit cloudy to me. In fact it seems like much more than that, that you are simply trying to overwhelm people with smoke and mirrors in an attempt to look like the expert. You're not, so please, drop the act. There are plenty of people out there who have much more experience and expertise in this field than you do.

And again, you complain of insults, that you're the wronged victim here of a sharp tongue. Well, first of all, as the DU rules state, grow a thick skin. Second of all, if you can't take it, don't dish it out. Your posts have been beyond condescending throughout our exchanges, your dismissal of anything that I post or link to that disagrees with your POV is accompanied by vitriol. Therefore, I respond in like kind. If you wish engage in a civil exchange, drop the attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC