Reply #298: You're simply being obstreperous. I don't "accuse"--where you get that shit, I've no idea. [View All]

[MADem]

I could give a crap about you, I'm not going to prance about "accusing" you of anything. That takes energy, and I won't waste it on a whinging "internet tough guy." You did use stupid snark in your reply to me. That's not an "accusation," it's fact.

You have no interest in discussing this topic, you simply want to play a childish "verbal wrestling" game. I've no interest in that nonsense, either.

Gee, you've "seen some of my other responses in other threads?" My, how special. You make a rather dire, though unformed, suggestion there, without the courage to follow through. Oooh, should I be upset? Scared? How does that remark advance the topic under discussion? Why, it doesn't--but then, that's not your agenda, apparently. You'd rather do the old "casting of asparagus" (yuck, yuck) that is the hallmark of a very few faux intellectuals on these here internets than discuss the Cradle to Cradle paradigm shift that is already showing astounding promise in the few applications that have been made, thus far, around the world.

FWIW, I provided some salient links in THIS thread, that discussed that very model, which is a complete break from the typical "sustainable" one that eventually drains the earth of resources. The model discussed is beyond sustainable--it is a model that replaces and grows resources. Of course, to understand it, you have to do something called "reading" before you toss stupid turdlets that don't advance the discussion of the topic by way of response.

You might try examining this new paradigm before you continue to make an absolute ass of yourself. In any event, I don't care if you do or don't, because your concrete mind is made up. You're stuck in a "doom and gloom" rut, and you're quite free to rot there.

:hi: