You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: People aren't claiming it as a new idea, as it wasn't in 2008. But it is NOT in the current law. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. People aren't claiming it as a new idea, as it wasn't in 2008. But it is NOT in the current law.
Edited on Wed Apr-13-11 11:05 PM by spooky3
The point is that people are advocating that it be implemented rather than let the pharmaceuticals triumph again and cuts be made in other places.

People have been talking about doing it since well before Bush's addition of the pres. drug benefit without the funds to pay for it and expressly outlawing the negotiation of prices, to keep his benefactors in the drug industry happy. This time people need to take this issue on and not give in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC