You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #154: That's precisely what happened in the Duke case, so I'm not sure why you have [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #144
154. That's precisely what happened in the Duke case, so I'm not sure why you have
such a problem with the outcome?

Get this through your head--STATEMENTS ARE EVIDENCE. If they contradict other evidence, what conclusions are we supposed to draw? Her own evidence (statements) contradicted her other evidence (statements).

And the prosecutor should have gone forward for just what reason (at least answer this one specific question--the judge would insist you do so)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC