You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #45: Stewart didn't imply anything. He pointed out simple facts [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. Stewart didn't imply anything. He pointed out simple facts
facts you dont dispute but smear Stewart anyway.

Are you okay with the white house holding meetings with lobbyists across the street from the white house so they dont have to disclose those meetings?

Are you okay with Obama prosecuting more whistle blowers than any administration in 40 years?

Are you okay with Obama censoring emails about their efforts to bring more transparency to government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC