You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: There is no link because it came directly to me. It is not disinformation. WIki is not adequate [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. There is no link because it came directly to me. It is not disinformation. WIki is not adequate
for any medical use. Wiki is not "actual evidence".

I provided no link because it came directly to me, not through a link. Some of us do have other acquaintances outside DU and do correspond with people outside DU.

I am sharing what he wrote. You show no evidence to prove this disinformation and your snark about " people who lack a good scientific education can get sucked into believing that it sounds plausible, but it's totally bogus" won't go over well with this doctor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC