You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: The answers to your questions. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. The answers to your questions.
Edited on Fri Apr-15-11 03:06 PM by Ozymanithrax
Is the President's "progressive" talk helping or hurting the Democratic Party?

Supporting changes that improves the lives of middle class and poor will help the party. I'm not sure if that is progressive in a historical sense. Progressives detested Social Security and considered FDR a Banker.

Is it helping to unite the Democrats or will divide the Party?

The Conservadem/Blue Dogs, DLC, Bushdems. Boll weevils, Dixicrats. Bipartisans wings of the democratic party may be concerned that his rhetoric will not encourage the Compromise that has historically been seen as necessary for running government. But unless they are going to vote Republican or for a third party it is unlikely to be a problem.

Will it make the Democratic Party stronger in the next election or weaker?

I think it will make the party stronger by appealing to the independents who do not pay attention to the election until a week before it happens.

Will the President get credit for defending the programs of the New Deal and the Great Society or will he get blamed for losing them?

He will be blamed for anything he doesn't veto that weakens these programs. Some people (on the left and right) will blame him for a rainy day, so they won't matter.

If President does manage to save Medicare and Social Security from these radical right-wingers, how would history accord him?

As one of the great Presidents, assuming he doesn't blow it in some other fashion.

Is it good we stand together to defend these programs?

It is better to hang together, especially since if we don't we will hang separately.

Or should we simply let the Republican right-wingers dismantle them without a fight?

I don't believe in laying down like a whipped dog, even if we are doomed to lose. It is better to burn then to fade away. Johnny Rotten got that much right.

If the President wants to lead in this battle, I stand behind him.

I stand behind him as long as he does something besides talk. Actions speak louder than words. Giving a good speech and then surrendering never occurred to Custer. Even if this is the liberals Little Big Horn, it should not occur to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC