Reply #54: So post that data, then. If you have access to it, post it. Not hypersensitive hyperbole. [View All]

[readmoreoften]

The point of scientific research is that anyone can have access to it and come to the same conclusions. Salivating over the defense of one scientists' work is not "pro-science." It's anti-science, slanted, and arrogant. Posting outrageous hyperbole and strawmen against people in search of ongoing information from multiple sources is illogical and anti-scientific.

I have NO IDEA whether Fukushima presents any danger to those outside the immediate radius of the event. That's why I'm looking for all possible data. And, no, I'm not going to trust one pro-nuclear (or anti-nuclear, for that matter) scientist on the issue. That is not "slander." It's being science-minded.