LittleClarkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:23 PM
Original message |
Isn't Roberts kinda underqualified? |
|
All politics aside, have we ever had a chief justice who'd hardly spent any time on the bench before?
Anyone know their history?
|
fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:26 PM
Original message |
He is a CRONY...and Cronyism just showed America the Horrific |
|
results... it allows inept people to high Position with disastrous consequences....
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He's an expert equestrian.
|
Quixote1818
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
3. He has about as much experience as Brown had before being |
|
put in charge of FEMA. Qualifications mean nothing to Bush.
|
gollygee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Oh! You think they want *professional* qualifications! |
|
Silly silly silly. Those aren't the qualifications they want.
*sigh*
|
yourout
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I am as qualified as this loser and.... |
|
the only court time I have is for traffic tickets.
|
Joe Chi Minh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
20. That may sound like a joke to you, but |
|
in Bushworld, it's no less than the reality. Your professional potential virtually knows no bounds. Your parents sure would be proud of you... if they were neocons, anyway.
|
shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
6. All the people * has appointed or nominated are |
|
underqualified. He has a perfect records on that.
|
highplainsdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Kinda underqualified, like Katrina was kinda a big storm. |
|
He's unbelievably underqualified. Like Michael Brown at FEMA.
Like W, too...
|
Jeanette in FL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Original message |
Like you need experience in this administration |
|
Mike Brown FEMA Director, he was fired from his last job, Arabian Horse Judge Committee
|
StellaBlue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He's far more qualified than *.
|
mattclearing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
9. They like to nominate young, in order to ensure longer dominance. n/t |
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
10. no more underqualified than any of the bushturd's appointees |
|
has there ever been a bigger group of less qualified asswads?
|
Webster Green
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
11. That meets the #1 requirement for a chimp appointee... |
|
Don't know about this historically though.
Demand resignations! Now!
|
dogday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
12. You have to wonder how this is sitting with the other Justices nt |
LittleClarkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
KingFlorez
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Maybe a prostitute like Gannon |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-05-05 01:29 PM by KingFlorez
Strange how he could get the position with very little qualification.
|
Mz Pip
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message |
14. You don't even have to have a law degree |
|
to be on the Supreme Court. Correct me if I'm wrong but I seem to have read that somewhere. So if that is true then Roberts is certainly "qualified" by the virtue of being alive and human.
Still he hasn't had much judicial experience but for Bush that is a good thing since there is little "paper trail."
What I find interesting about this is the timing. I really wonder if this move would have happened if it had not been for the hurricane. This nomination of Roberts to Chief Justice sure has diverted some attention away from BushCo's inept handling of the hurricane disaster.
Nominating Scalia wouldn't have caused much talk. That was expected, really. Roberts on the other hand is sure to get the pundits focus off of Katrina.
THis has Rove's fingerprints all over it because it once again deflects the focus and puts the Deomcrats on the defensive.
Mz Pip :dem:
|
punpirate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
16. His mentor, Rehnquist, had... |
|
... no judicial experience at all before nomination. Lewis Powell had spent his entire life as a corporate lawyer.
So, having a couple of years on the court of appeals is not the least experience of prior nominees.
|
KamaAina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Well, look who appointed him, for crying out loud! |
|
King Dumbass** is underqualified to be a dogcatcher!
|
yorkiemommie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
|
a nastyminded ideologue in the Bush mold. just perfect for *.
|
FormerRepublican
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message |
19. He wants Roberts running the show for the impeachment hearings. |
killbotfactory
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message |
21. but he's a photogenic family man... |
|
what more qualifications do you need?
|
Talismom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Since when did that make any difference to this admin.? n/t |
Fescue4u
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Yes, but I understand the strategy |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-05-05 01:55 PM by Fescue4u
Obviously Roberts is Bushys kinda of guy. I dont think anyone would argu that.
1st, The younger the chief justice is, the longer they'll serve and hence the longer the mark the president gets to make on the court. By Choosing an existing Justice who is already getting up in years, would ensure that he won't serve nearly as long as a freshly minted Justice.
2nd, By doing its this way, its almost a 3 for 2 deal. Bush gets to appoint the Chief Justice, and fill 2 vacancys, hence 3 impacts with two appointments.
|
MojoXN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Understatement of the year.
MojoXN
|
billkurtmeyer
(360 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Not in bizzaro Bush world - the least qualified rise to the top - |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message |