Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Isn't Roberts kinda underqualified?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:23 PM
Original message
Isn't Roberts kinda underqualified?
All politics aside, have we ever had a chief justice who'd hardly spent any time on the bench before?

Anyone know their history?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kinda?
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:26 PM
Original message
He is a CRONY...and Cronyism just showed America the Horrific
results... it allows inept people to high Position with disastrous consequences....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not to worry
He's an expert equestrian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. He has about as much experience as Brown had before being
put in charge of FEMA. Qualifications mean nothing to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh! You think they want *professional* qualifications!
Silly silly silly. Those aren't the qualifications they want.

*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am as qualified as this loser and....
the only court time I have is for traffic tickets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. That may sound like a joke to you, but
in Bushworld, it's no less than the reality. Your professional potential virtually knows no bounds. Your parents sure would be proud of you... if they were neocons, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. All the people * has appointed or nominated are
underqualified. He has a perfect records on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kinda underqualified, like Katrina was kinda a big storm.
He's unbelievably underqualified. Like Michael Brown at FEMA.

Like W, too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Original message
Like you need experience in this administration
Mike Brown FEMA Director, he was fired from his last job, Arabian Horse Judge Committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StellaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. ...
He's far more qualified than *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. They like to nominate young, in order to ensure longer dominance. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. no more underqualified than any of the bushturd's appointees
has there ever been a bigger group of less qualified asswads?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. That meets the #1 requirement for a chimp appointee...
Don't know about this historically though.


Demand resignations! Now!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. You have to wonder how this is sitting with the other Justices nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Esp. Scalia
Who wanted it badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. Maybe a prostitute like Gannon
Edited on Mon Sep-05-05 01:29 PM by KingFlorez
Strange how he could get the position with very little qualification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. You don't even have to have a law degree
to be on the Supreme Court. Correct me if I'm wrong but I seem to have read that somewhere. So if that is true then Roberts is certainly "qualified" by the virtue of being alive and human.

Still he hasn't had much judicial experience but for Bush that is a good thing since there is little "paper trail."

What I find interesting about this is the timing. I really wonder if this move would have happened if it had not been for the hurricane. This nomination of Roberts to Chief Justice sure has diverted some attention away from BushCo's inept handling of the hurricane disaster.

Nominating Scalia wouldn't have caused much talk. That was expected, really. Roberts on the other hand is sure to get the pundits focus off of Katrina.

THis has Rove's fingerprints all over it because it once again deflects the focus and puts the Deomcrats on the defensive.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. His mentor, Rehnquist, had...
... no judicial experience at all before nomination. Lewis Powell had spent his entire life as a corporate lawyer.

So, having a couple of years on the court of appeals is not the least experience of prior nominees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. Well, look who appointed him, for crying out loud!
King Dumbass** is underqualified to be a dogcatcher!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. he's an ideologue

a nastyminded ideologue in the Bush mold. just perfect for *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. He wants Roberts running the show for the impeachment hearings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
21. but he's a photogenic family man...
what more qualifications do you need?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Talismom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. Since when did that make any difference to this admin.? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yes, but I understand the strategy
Edited on Mon Sep-05-05 01:55 PM by Fescue4u
Obviously Roberts is Bushys kinda of guy. I dont think anyone would argu that.

1st, The younger the chief justice is, the longer they'll serve and hence the longer the mark the president gets to make on the court. By Choosing an existing Justice who is already getting up in years, would ensure that he won't serve nearly as long as a freshly minted Justice.

2nd, By doing its this way, its almost a 3 for 2 deal. Bush gets to appoint the Chief Justice, and fill 2 vacancys, hence 3 impacts with two appointments.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MojoXN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. Kind of?
Understatement of the year.

MojoXN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billkurtmeyer Donating Member (360 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. Not in bizzaro Bush world - the least qualified rise to the top -
look at Brownie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC