Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maybe All Tim Russert Was Missing Was a Bucket of Water

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 02:27 PM
Original message
Maybe All Tim Russert Was Missing Was a Bucket of Water
Media Bistro: Tuesday May 13, 2008
Maybe All Tim Russert Was Missing Was a Bucket of Water

Another Tuesday, another primary. We're not hearing so much about today's voting in West Virginia, maybe because it's not a "Super Tuesday" per se, maybe because Hillary is expected to win it (maybe because of catastrophic events elsewhere). Not that this primary matters so much since, as you may recall, the press already declared Obama the winner sometime last week in the aftermath of Super Tuesday IV. According to Roger Simon on this week's Reliable Sources "Russert declaring that it was over was like Cronkite turning against the Vietnam War. You know, it made it official."

One supposes the rest is just noise. It's not like the press have a questionable track record where these things are concerned. Anyway, who are we to argue? Nonetheless, a number of people have taken issue with this assumption, including, one has to assume, all the people currently voting in WV. Perhaps they are also wondering over the fairness of the press's ability to just swoop in, willy nilly, and decide things as they see fit when everyone else had to stand in really long lines to accomplish the same thing.

Over at Slate Jack Shafer says that last Tuesday was just an excuse for the press to jump in: "They've wanted to say that Obama has cinched the nomination since his March victory in the Mississippi primary — or before." Howard Kurtz agrees saying last Tuesday "became sort of an artificial benchmark that enabled a lot of people in the press who thought that Hillary was going to lose anyway...to declare her candidacy to be history."

Or maybe the press just doesn't like Hillary (novel concept to be sure). On the same Reliable Sources, NYT's writer Kate Zernike conceded that the reaction from the public may have been less about the media's declaration than about Hillary's treatment by the media: "I think what people were reacting to this week wasn't so much the media declaring the race over, as it was this kind of 'Ding dong the witch is dead' quality about that tone to the comments."

http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/news/maybe_all_tim_russert_was_missing_was_a_bucket_of_water_84610.asp#more
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. It so takes me back to 2000 and the media treatment of Gore
They couldn't make enough fun of him. Margaret Carlson even laughed about it! And they were so anxious to declare Bush the winner that perception became reality.

I think people WILL look back to this election and see what they did to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. damn...if hillary had 'closed the deal' on 2.05.08...
those people in W.Va. could be out working or hunting or something...

and probably never realizing they weren't being 'respected' or that they were being labeled 'disenfranchised'...

there must be a great feeling in W. Va. today...hillary kept THEM IMPORTANT...

ask them how important she felt they were on 2.04.08...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC