girl gone mad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-10 07:48 PM
Original message |
Assange Confirms that Bank of America Is the Target of Bank Leak |
|
As we all suspected. From http://www.washingtonsblog.com">Washington's Blog: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 Assange Confirms that Bank of America Is the Target of Bank Leak
There has been widespread speculation that WikiLeaks would target Bank of America.
This has now been confirmed.
Specifically, Agence Press France is reporting:
Assange also confirmed that WikiLeaks was holding a vast amount of material about Bank of America which it intends to release early next year.
|
hlthe2b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-10 08:00 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Good... I hope he's got the goods on some of the others, too |
right2bfree
(383 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Me too. B of A sucks. nt |
Alameda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Great! Years ago I had an account at BoA....I lost the account book |
|
and in the time it took me to find it they had confiscated my account. It was over 30 years ago and it was a saving account. I wonder how many people they have done that to. It was only a couple of hundred dollars and the time and hassle it would have taken to get it back was not worth it to me. Needless to say, I didn't know the process. The account was in CA and I was living in NY.
|
right2bfree
(383 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-22-10 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Same thing happened to a person I know. B of A is a dirtbag business of thieves. nt |
FiveGoodMen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-10 08:53 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Wish he'd hurry up and get it out there! |
dixiegrrrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-10 08:54 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Christmas indeed!!!!!!!! |
|
I am not a perfect human my any means and I WILL enjoy what comes out about this.
|
jtuck004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-22-10 12:52 AM
Response to Original message |
6. It would depend on the nature of what he has, but if it has to do with |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 12:52 AM by jtuck004
the CEO's personal knowledge that the bank was creating CDO's with fraudulent intent, or had controlling interest in predatory lenders, or were using hedge fund money to leverage investments outside of the allowances made by the S.E.C., this has the potential of bringing the whole discussion of how they created toxic assets and foisted them on the country.
Much of that seems to have fallen off the radar, even though it is all still very much alive, so I can't help thinking this is a good thing, though in reading the reporting it doesn't sound like it would be at the level of a national scandal or criminal action.
We shall see...
|
Hawkowl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-22-10 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. This is why Holder is after Assange |
|
I don't think they give a rat's ass about the military leaks. They need to stop the leaking of Wall Street's criminal activities.
|
grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-29-10 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. are you saying a national scandal would be bad? |
|
and exposing criminal action would be bad?
|
CanonRay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-22-10 09:36 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Now Assange is in real trouble |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 09:36 AM by CanonRay
to take on the U.S. government is one thing, but to take on the owners of that government? Quite another.
|
Karenina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-24-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message |