Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Analyst: BofA with a market cap of only $65b needs $40-$50b of new capital

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 03:36 PM
Original message
Analyst: BofA with a market cap of only $65b needs $40-$50b of new capital
Edited on Mon Aug-22-11 03:43 PM by Ruby the Liberal
:wow:

This is so not good for the too-big-to-fail. Forgetting the dilution, their stock tanked another 8% today AND is trading at 1/7th of what it was before the crisis. Time to break them up.

(My prediction - they sell off Merrill)

Bank of America (BAC) insists it has more than enough capital, but the market clearly disagrees.
The stock was pounded again today in an up market, dropping 8% to $6.42. One analyst, Layla Peruzzi of Jefferies, thinks that Bank of America needs to raise an eye-popping $40-$50 billion.

-snip-

Three years ago, before the financial crisis, Bank of America's stock was trading above $50, more than 7X today's value. For two years after the financial crisis and disastrous purchase of Countrywide, the stock traded above $15, 2X today's value.

So the company had plenty of time to store acorns for a rough winter. But despite a near-death experience during the financial crisis two years ago, it never learned.


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/bank-of-america-may-need-to-raise-40-50-billion-of-capital-analyst-2011-8#ixzz1VnAMgrVK
Refresh | +10 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not worth saving
The Feds should seize them, then break it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. +1000 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. They have the attorney generals of both
New York State and Washington State biting after their hind quarters. Actions from the two AG's are due to the fraudulent practices of BoA in its foreclosure practices.

Attorney General for Washington State wants to reach back to foreclosures handled by BoA clear back to 2008!

Of course, Obama, being owned By Wall Street, will look the other way when Ben Bernanke slips BoA the money needed.

After all, BoA is too big to fail!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Delaware too.
Beau Biden jumped into the fray a week or so ago and attached Delaware to the NY State action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Good to know. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Allstate just filed suit against them this week.
trust fund mortgage fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Was Allstate funding annuities with this trust
or was it an internal investment (if you know)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. dunno. None of the articles I read said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. If they are under contractural obligation on the annuity general fund
This could be a real mess. Moreso than taking a tax-writeoff/loss. That they can overcome, but annuities represent future obligations.

Why I wasn't too heartbroken when they chose Cordray for CFPB - once I read his bio and work in Ohio on this. If the handwriting was on the wall with soon-to-be Senator (D-MA) Warren, he was a brilliant choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Darn, I was hoping your
really meant $40-$50 dollars, not that amount in billions. I'd almost be tempted to send them five bucks if they actually needed so little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ha! Thanks for catching that in time to edit.
:toast:

They could cover that need with 2 $35 overdraft fees. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. And there is this, now, from Denninger:
Highlights:

He suggests the stock's dive is by insider trading
and he says:

"The market ( stock market's pricing, today )
says that this firm( BOA) has a "book value" of one third of the claimed value on it's balance sheet.
If this is true then the bank is bankrupt at least six times over.
Bank of America has its stock price under attack for the simple reason that nobody believes the bank's asset valuations.
The market believes the bank is underwater to the tune of six times its reserves and is factually bankrupt."

good read, I recommend.

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=192745

PS: anyone remember how long I have been saying BOA is going to go DOWN!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
westerebus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. About the time they punked NY AG Spitzer.
Is about the first one I recall. Linda Green's signature was a popular rant at the time. No idea of the date, just the reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. He makes a good point about prosecutions under SOX after 2007
If they couldn't see fit to add strings to the TARP bailout in the form of regulatory action, the least they could have done is fire up the SOX violation prosecutions.

I love Denninger when he talks the market, but he drives me batshit when he goes off on his drooling, foaming at the mouth Libertarian rants. Of course, Mish Shedlock is no better on that front, so there ya go, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. I agree re: Denninger.
Today I was happy to see that he was pissed at Republicans! and vowed to never vote for one again.
But, as you point out, his insight into money and the markets has proven to be very accurate, and has helped me out a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is my bank account in BAC safe?
Or should I bail? (Yes, I hate them too but I'm still in there for convenience, and because it will be a pita to have to set up a whole new online banking thing as well as change direct deposit things (like Paypal).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Po_d Mainiac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. If/when BAC shits the bed
There ain't enough money in FDIC to cover insured accoucts...It would require a massive raise in the debt ceiling to stoke the FDIC.

There will be a run on this shithouse of a bank...The last ones through the door may SOL
YMMV
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Lemme put it this way..
The reason my money is NOT in the big banks, and has not been for over 3 years:

FDIC is broke.
They are "supposed" to give you back your money, but there is NO law as to how long they can take and if they really can or will give you back ALL your money.

2nd point:
think long and hard on what "too big to fail" really means re: banks.
As in "those towers were too big to fall"

Do you really want to be standing around congratulating yourself on how much time and effort you saved by not moving your money?
How much money is worth the risk, and who do you trust to take care of your risk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. Thanks to you guys for your replies.
Actually, most of my money is in a community bank. I have a smaller account in BAC specifically to pay my bills. (I also had my check direct deposited there, but since I don't have a job, that's not an issue now.) I could open another checking account in the community bank, but I'm not that comfortable with doing online banking where I have the larger accounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Tell them not to associate them.
Make sure that they don't allow online access to them and have them put up a firewall to protect the checking account you do want online access for.

With the Patriot Act, you are very limited as to how you can open/hold accounts, but if you talk with the branch manager, they may have some suggestions depending on how they interpret the laws of your state (and their technology capabilities*) on how you can accomplish what you want to do and be comfortable with it.




*Some banks may not be capable of putting firewalls between accounts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Thanks.
I have a feeling my bank might be one that can't do that but I can talk to them to find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I can't advise one way or another
But I will offer that I closed all of my accounts earlier this year while I was still working for one of their subsidiaries.

The FDIC thing scares me. Credit unions are insured, but not tied to the FDIC system.

Do what you think is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. f BOA blows - and the market is saying it's going to - it won't matter what they try to do.
"There is neither ability or will to stop the collapse that will result from that."

So says Denninger today, same link as I provided in previous post here.

We shall see....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. We need to start a pool
I am thinking they are going to gut MerrillEdge with the first round of 3,500 job cuts this week and move it out of the branches and back into the call center with a refocus on self-directed investing. Divesture of Merrill proper by the end of November. IPO it or sell it outright to JP Morgan Chase or UBS. Too much overlap with Morgan Stanley to make that profitable and too low end (avg asset size) for Goldman.

Any takers? :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Po_d Mainiac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Naw ...
They'll get more money by spinning of Countrywide :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Angelo Mozillo is still laughing his ass off for pulling the wool over Ken Lewis
on that deal. Probably almost as hard as John Thain is from his deal.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I know that both Citi and BOA have sent letters to customers
saying that new address for billing is now Citibank N.A. and Bank of America N.A.
and that previous addresses for mailing mortgage or credit card payments will be no good effective July 1.

Which means they both are closing offices and re-organizing divisions, if i read that right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I can't speak to Citi
but BoA has been working for 2.5 years now to consolidate divisions and streamline systems from the Countrywide/Merrill mergers. Citi did sell Smith Barney to Morgan Stanley, so may be the same situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Po_d Mainiac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. That's a scheme used in the past
Payments go to wrong address, penalty for late payment follows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
27. Zombie bank.
Not good with the credit markets seizing up in Europe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
29. Wild day for Bank of America!!
Edited on Tue Aug-23-11 05:03 PM by Ruby the Liberal
First, they got into a pissing match with Henry Blodgett (former Merrill), blaming him for causing their stock to tank. First time I have *ever* seen a company singling out and blaming a lone blogger for moving the market against them.

Links:

Blodget's take on capital requirements: http://www.businessinsider.com/bank-of-americas-stock-collapse-2011-8

BAC's bizarre response (and personal attack): http://www.businessinsider.com/analyst-bank-of-americas-bizarre-personal-attack-on-henry-blodget-suggests-something-is-seriously-amiss-2011-8


Then, confirming my prediction (stated above) that JP Morgan would be the likely one to take over Merrill (if not the whole bank), that rumor is now flying around the street because JPM this morning bizarrely upgraded their BAC outlook without explanation:

JP Morgan rumor: http://www.businessinsider.com/rumor-jp-morgan-may-take-over-bank-of-america-2011-8

JP Morgan's bizarre upgrade of BAC: http://www.businessinsider.com/rumor-jp-morgan-may-take-over-bank-of-america-2011-8
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
30. Interesting Read: Calling for the nationalization of BAC (and steps to make it happen)
This is definitely worth a read for anyone interested in this kind of thing (the Swedish Solution)

http://www.businessinsider.com/all-right-its-time-for-a-new-kind-of-bank-of-america-solution-the-right-kind-2011-8
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC