|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 03:40 PM Original message |
Analysis of radioactive emissions at Fukushima - much more than Chernobyl or TMI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mnemosyne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
2. 1 Chernobyl every 2-10 days in terms of Cs emissions. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
3. 2.61 tons of radioactive poison.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Well.... it could be umm.. 200.62 tons so in a way we're lucky! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 07:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
38. Heres are article from the 15th that is saying that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 11:17 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. You were posting that just for the laughs, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. So says "Jim" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Well according to you the current situation could not possibly occur. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:27 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. And I was able to convince DU to hide that post, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:31 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Bigger Point: "JIM" is doing the work, the analysis because he care about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 09:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. If only "cares about this" added credibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 02:14 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. You've been wrong about everything at every stage... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 05:07 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. You haven't read posts by this "kristopher" fellow, have you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 08:35 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. he forgot to mention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 08:46 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Lol... you didn't follow yesterday's conversation , did you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 09:20 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. That is an interesting perspective. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 10:50 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Not really... it's reality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 10:41 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. no, it's your pro-nuke myopic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diane in sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 02:30 AM Response to Reply #24 |
41. Thank youSpoonFed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 08:53 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Your criticism of kristopher's ever-effervescent advocacy notwithstanding... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 08:57 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. That's just the way thing are... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 09:08 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Your attempt at damage control makes the TEPCO PR Dept. blush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 10:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. you have blinders on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReturnoftheDjedi (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 10:47 AM Response to Reply #13 |
34. You don't know how to debate, Frodo. You're too certain that you're right about everything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 12:22 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. I've seen that claim several times in the last couple days. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbineguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 04:02 PM Response to Reply #34 |
46. And it IS about the debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:45 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. You have been an unending fount of false conclusions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 09:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Heavy on bluster... low on facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReturnoftheDjedi (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 10:42 AM Response to Reply #5 |
32. "Frodo" the internet Nuclear expert is so much more reliable, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:35 AM Response to Original message |
14. Kick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
22. Oh boy, another attempt to make this look worse than Chernobyl. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 11:33 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Not really "another"... just a bumped thread from two weeks ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 11:00 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. blatent logical inconsistency in your argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 12:10 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Thank you, but I'll construct my own analogies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 08:03 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. uh, you're free to pick your poor analogies, sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 08:22 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 09:06 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I'll repeat it again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 09:38 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. I think I see what you're getting at. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-22-11 12:26 AM Response to Reply #31 |
48. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Someguyinjapan (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-22-11 06:35 AM Response to Reply #28 |
50. An interesting note... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReturnoftheDjedi (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 10:44 AM Response to Reply #22 |
33. Iodine has a half-life of 8 days. Cesium's is about 30 years. More Cesium = Way worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 12:47 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. "More cesium" DOES = "way worse" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caraher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 08:45 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. This matches what my nuclear physicist colleague found |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReturnoftheDjedi (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:30 AM Response to Reply #39 |
43. you mean that there's no mechanism yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caraher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 08:49 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. Outline a plausible mechanism... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReturnoftheDjedi (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-22-11 11:24 AM Response to Reply #47 |
54. if anything makes it to the water table, the plume will be massive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-22-11 11:29 AM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Did you by any chance look at those thermal images? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 12:17 AM Response to Reply #55 |
57. thermal imagery is useful but it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 06:23 AM Response to Reply #57 |
59. It doesn't HAVE to be "perfect" to prove the UFO nuts wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReturnoftheDjedi (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:29 AM Response to Reply #36 |
42. would you drink the Fukushima milk, Frodo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:54 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. The stuff that passed for three weeks straight? Sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 12:18 AM Response to Reply #44 |
58. where's the strontium? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 06:30 AM Response to Reply #58 |
60. Hiding under Harry Potter's invisibility cloak? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Someguyinjapan (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-22-11 06:26 AM Response to Reply #36 |
49. Once More... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-22-11 06:47 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Happy to oblige |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Someguyinjapan (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-22-11 07:26 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Maybe I didn't make myself clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-22-11 07:55 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Sorry... I guess I gave you too much credit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 12:11 AM Response to Reply #53 |
56. seemed like a reasonable request |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 06:35 AM Response to Reply #56 |
61. Just proving your bias... thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 09:03 AM Response to Reply #61 |
62. haha FBags doesn't know how to cite anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbineguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
37. So that's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
45. Deleted message |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC