NY Power Authority Trustees Vote to End Proposed Great Lakes Offshore Wind Project

[OKIsItJustMe]

http://www.nypa.gov/Press/2011/110927b.html

NY Power Authority Trustees Vote to End Proposed Great Lakes Offshore Wind Project

Contact:
Connie Cullen
[phone]
[e-mail]

September 27, 2011

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

WHITE PLAINS—The New York Power Authority (NYPA) Board of Trustees on Tuesday voted to end the competitive solicitation process for the proposed Great Lakes Offshore Wind Project (GLOW), without awarding a contract for project development.

The estimated annual cost of GLOW and the current economic conditions were the reasons for the Trustees’ action. Evaluation of the proposed project’s economics determined that it would not be fiscally prudent for the Power Authority to commit to the initiative. Development of a 150 megawatt (MW) GLOW project would have resulted in an estimated annual subsidy of between $60 million and $100 million, resulting in a significant cost premium to NYPA.

“While deciding not to proceed with GLOW, the Power Authority will continue its commitment to developing and implementing wind and other clean alternative energy sources to produce emissions-free power for the benefit of New Yorkers today and for future generations,” said Gil C. Quiniones, acting president and chief executive officer, NYPA. “The Power Authority’s participation in the evaluation of the LI-NYC Offshore Wind Project and in the regional efforts of such organizations as the Great Lakes Commission and the Great Lakes Wind Collaborative shows NYPA’s dedication to affordable and environmentally-sound development of future offshore wind projects in New York State waters.”

The Power Authority received five responses to the GLOW RFP from Apex Offshore Wind LLC; Great Winds, LLC; NRG Bluewater Wind Great Lakes LLC; Pattern Renewables Development Company, LLC; and RES Americas Developments Inc. A thorough multi-disciplinary review of the proposals was conducted, which evaluated a wide range of criteria including expected costs, potential economic development benefits, community response, and environmental impacts. While the evaluation indicated the project was technically feasible, the generating output of the proposed 120 MW to 500 MW project would have cost two to four times more than land-based wind.

…

[Nihil]

1. Surprising ...

> While the evaluation indicated the project was technically feasible, the
> generating output of the proposed 120 MW to 500 MW project would have cost
> two to four times more than land-based wind.

I thought that offshore was supposed to be far more effective than onshore?

:shrug:

(Not snark, genuine confusion)

[OnlinePoker]

2. I believe it produces more steady wind power

but it's a lot more expensive to situate and maintain the towers.

[OKIsItJustMe]

3. There was also a good deal of “NIMBYism”

Offshore of Long Island may apparently be practical…

http://www.nypa.gov/Press/2011/110927b.html

…

NYPA with its collaborative partners, Con Edison of New York and the Long Island Power Authority, is pursuing the evaluation of the LI-NYC Offshore Wind Project in the Atlantic Ocean off the southern coast of Long Island. Recently, the LI-NYC Offshore Wind Collaborative—comprised of the three utilities—took another step to advance this project by submitting a lease application to the federal government for undersea land identified as a possible location for this project. While the economics of the project continue to be studied, the difference between GLOW and the LI-NYC project are primarily the participation of multiple utilities involved in the evaluation and that the LI-NYC project is located adjacent to a dense population area in a high-priced energy market.

…

There were NIMBY howls all along the lake shores.