Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Man convicted of child porn gets gun rights back

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 11:07 AM
Original message
Man convicted of child porn gets gun rights back
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2015558376_apwasheriffchildporn.html

TACOMA, Wash. — A retired Piercy County Sheriff convicted of possessing child pornography in 2004 has regained his right to possess a gun.

The Tacoma News Tribune reports that Pierce County Superior Court Judge Bryan Chushcoff okayed former Sheriff Mark French's petition to vacate his child porn conviction from his record and regain his gun rights.

The 62-year-old French pleaded guilty in 2004 to possessing child pornography. He had retired in 2000 after a 30-year career in law enforcement.

<more>
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's probably because the man in question is a retired career LEO.
I doubt a retired career factory worker in the same situation would have gotten his rights back in the same situation, though I may be wrong.

California and Massachusetts exempt retired LEO's from numerous gun laws that apply to the peons, by statute. It appears that some other states extend similar privileges by different means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. The naked gun 33.5
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. My understanding is that if a conviction is vacated, it does not exist
basically like a pardon. He would also get his voting rights back in the South. The gun rights is not the issue, the issue is why the conviction was vacated in the first place. The article focused on a minor side effect and ignored the important question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. The article was short, and doesn't say if it was a misdemenor or a felony.
I'm assuming that since his right was stripped, it was a felony.


Okay, so he's no longer a felon. Whoppee. He can vote, now, too. And hold elected office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC