Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which do you prefer--the Democratic party of 1932 or the Democratic party of 2009?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:06 PM
Original message
Poll question: Which do you prefer--the Democratic party of 1932 or the Democratic party of 2009?
There's been some talk about how people miss the Democratic party of FDR and its populism. So, let's put it to the test.

Do we favor the New Deal, the WPA, and segregated lunch counters?

Or do we favor racial equality, the current health care bill, and TARP?
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. for those voting for 1932, were you even alive then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. apparently, most DU'ers want to roll back the clock.
Though the polls are still open. . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. even when they have no idea what it was like in 1932...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I prefer a progressive democratic socialist alternative. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Is Sweden taking US refugees?
If so, I might consider it myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I will seriously consider the EU if the Teabag Party takes over. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I'm heading to Costa Rica
if that happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. If Democrats sit home on their fat asses in 2010, it could happen
Because the baggers are going to be out in full force to "Take Their Country Back" to the stoneage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
the other one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. How about Mario Cuomo's Democratic Party of 1984
A fully mature party of social justice that countered a charismatic Ronald Reagan with a block of petrified wood named Walter Mondale

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOdIqKsv624
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Unfortunately, that party did nothing because it got
its ass handed to it at the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Ugh...you make me miss my state. My family were avid fanatics of Cuomo.
We advocated for him to be President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Why didn't he run? Very frustrating. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. We never new. I was a kid at the time and I think he said he wanted to retire from politics.
I guess he had had enough. But then I know he had a lot of opposition from peeps in New York too. I know my dad adored him and my mum was a horrible fangirl (she was a Guilliani fangirl until 2002). She didn't like him advocating for a third term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Strawman argument. Of course, nobody supports racism.
This does not mean that we could not do with a little more progressivism in the party. It is not as if both were desperatedly linked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. No, but it's a matter of priorities. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. What priorities? Making sure people have healthcare and a job?
Or making sure corporations are happy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Priorities are: economic populism and jobs programs
vs ending discrimination in society and a more cooperative approach to dealing with big corporations

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hold the phone
Everybody needs to read Donald Ritchie's book on that campaign:

http://www.amazon.com/Electing-FDR-Campaign-Presidential-Elections/dp/0700615504

Fact is that the Democratic campaign that year, and the party platform, was conservative, calling for balancing the federal budget.

FDR was vague about the New Deal and policy specific programs in that campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. The defining characteristics are what they actually did while in office. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Absolutely true-- in some ways FDR ran to the right of Hoover!
Franklin Roosevelt's first vice president, John Garner, during the campaign accused Herbert Hoover of “leading the country down the path of socialism."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. "Cactus Jack"
"The vice presidency isn't worth a bucket of warm shit"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
19. Golly, who could think there was an agenda in THAT question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. What are you talking about?
I was genuinely curious about which Democratic party people preferred.

So, far, economic populism + apartheid is winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. "So far" a grand total of 13 members have taken the bait.
Congratulations if you reach 20.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC