ncteechur
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 11:31 PM
Original message |
Did the bill pass by the two seats we just picked up?? If so, that is SWEEEEEEET! |
|
Thank you Sarah Palin and Glen Beck!
|
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 11:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
... you could def. argue that if the GOP had won those seats the bill would not have passed tonight.
|
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 11:32 PM
Response to Original message |
2. well, one was already a Dem, wasn't it? but yeah, it helped! nt |
Brother Buzz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. It was a dem seat has been vacant since June when Ellen Tauscher joined the State department |
|
Two new democratic votes in the house that were not there a week ago.
|
NRaleighLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 11:33 PM
Response to Original message |
3. From what I read, Pelosi had as many as 230 or more - but |
|
she may have released some to vote Nay to protect their seats.
Always politics!
|
vaberella
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. Oooh...these political games are beyond me sometimes. |
|
Then what about the people who voted nay to allow the Stupak?
|
CitizenLeft
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-07-09 11:35 PM
Response to Original message |
liberalpragmatist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:11 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Some of the nays would have been yeas |
|
Leadership usually gives some vulnerable seats permission to vote nay so long as passage is assured.
|
vaberella
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-08-09 12:15 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Oh shit good point. Well I guess that settles FrenchieCat's question on House or Governor. |
|
I wanted House seats...and they came through. Thank God.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |