AtLiberty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-05-06 08:26 PM
Original message |
Gay Marriage Ban Likely Off Ballot this November in Illinois |
|
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/7/5/192019/5487Btw, the Illinois Family Institute/Protect Marriage Illinois started fundraising for an appeal weeks ago, anticipating this decision.
|
mopinko
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-06-06 07:59 AM
Response to Original message |
|
thanks to those that made this happen. i kept trying to get this on my to do list, and failed. i sure knew they smelled funny.
|
dogfacedboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-08-06 01:25 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Illinois will NEVER pass a law which outlaws same sex marriage. |
|
Even the most 'party line hack type' of the R's in Illinois are 'Progressive' when compared to the mouth-breathers and knuckle-draggers who foolishly believe they are the imaginary "mainstream America".
I'll tell you what--- if the right-tards get their way in passing the anti-gay/anti-abortion laws they waste their time trying to pass, I will IMMEDIATELY invest my money into ventures that provide SAFE, LEGAL and RARE abortions wherever, and whenever needed, and I will NEVER care about the legality of it. I will simultaneously invest into the industry of the NO-DOUBT-WHAT-SO-EVER FABULOUS weddings that the same sex marriage community will not only have a right to, but demand. I have attended MANY 'commitment' ceremonies/parties. "There's money in them thar hills".
|
Creideiki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-09-06 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Illinois already has a law that outlaws same-sex marriage |
|
At issue is whether that law will become part of the Constitution. As long as it remains a "law" there is a chance in a decade that it will be repealed when people decide to be nice to others and respect their privacy. If it becomes part of the Constitution, then it's going to be 20-30 years to get the damage undone.
|
dogfacedboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-24-06 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. Good catch. Thank You. Please pardon my wording. |
|
I was thinking Constitutionally. I just worded it wrong.
|
Critters2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-11-06 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. "Laws" aren't the issue |
|
Those commitment ceremonies you've attended...they have NO legal standing. Just a nice party for folks to say they love each other, of which I am totally in favor. BUt no bearing on taxes, insurance coverage, medical rights or coverage, etc. Illinois has no provision for same-sex marriage. I've done same-sex weddings, but I always warn the couple that they will NOT be legally married, I will NOT be signing a wedding license after the ceremony, and they need to see an attorney about ways to protect themselves.
The laws exist to keep same-sex marriages from being legally binding. The new threat is a constitutional amendment, at either the state or fed level, which would make it impossible for these marriages to ever become legally binding.
So, you need to call your broker. You've got some investing to do. The freeptards have already passed the anti-gay law.
|
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-19-06 10:12 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Peter LaBarbera got what was coming to him. He's a complete dick.
BTW: I think Illinois, actually, is receptive to civil union legislation. The Governor is in favor and I think it could pass the Legislature. Plus, I think the people of this state are receptive to civil unions.
|
DanCa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-20-06 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. We just gotta get Dems out to vote in November. |
|
That's going to be the big problem. Hopefuly the repukes will take this as a slap in the face and have another reason not to vote for Topinka
|
dogfacedboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-24-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. I don't even think Topinka would work too hard against civil unions. |
|
Edited on Thu Aug-24-06 08:52 AM by dogfacedboy
She certainly won't campaign on it, but she's a bit more moderate and progressive than some give her credit for. Her big issues are fiscal. That's her expertise. Being a Chicago Republican, she's not a far-right ideologue.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:06 PM
Response to Original message |