rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-29-07 09:01 PM
Original message |
So does Sen Murray support giving the telecoms retroactive immunity? Her response to my email |
|
was just rhetoric. Cantwell was clearly against. Retroactive immunity is outrageous in many aspects. If Murray supports immunity, we need to start now in getting someone to oppose her next bid.
|
eridani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-31-07 12:47 AM
Response to Original message |
1. That would have had to happen two years ago, minimum |
|
I'm sending her snail mail and email once a week on this, and recommending that others do likewise. The only way to get corporate influence out of the process is to put more progressive candidates in the pipeline, ASAP.
|
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-31-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Agree, but the current system will not support running a progressive |
|
against an incumbent. They are golden. Murray has nothing to worry about, the Democratic party will discourage any Democratic challenger and she knows it. I also write but am not confident it does any good.
Do you know if she has given any statement about supporting telecom immunity??
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:43 PM
Response to Original message |