Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Experts say Crown had to withdraw drug, driving charges against ex-MP Jaffer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 12:03 PM
Original message
Experts say Crown had to withdraw drug, driving charges against ex-MP Jaffer
Edited on Thu Mar-11-10 12:06 PM by daleo
TORONTO - Police defended their investigation that led to drug and drunk driving charges against former Conservative politician Rahim Jaffer while legal experts said Wednesday the Crown had no choice but to withdraw those charges.

Jaffer's guilty plea to the lesser charge of careless driving on Tuesday sparked a swirl of questions from opposition politicians and some members of the public about the outcome of the case.

"A very thorough and detailed investigation was completed and done," said provincial police spokesman Const. Peter Leon from headquarters in Orillia, Ont.
...
One legal source close to the case said anyone who thinks Jaffer got favourable treatment was wrong.

"If anything, he was treated more harshly because it was tougher for a Crown to come to this decision knowing they were going to get criticized for it," the source said.

"The evidence just wasn't there to convict him."
...
http://www.cbc.ca/cp/national/100310/n031077A.html
=====================================================================================================
So a nameless expert who may have gone to an invisible law school says "it's all good". Sorry, that doesn't work for me. I remember when nameless experts said we had to apologize to Mulroney, because he had no dealings with Schreiber.

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep, when I see...
"One legal source close to the case..." I see a Con hack doing his government's bidding and hiding behind the old "source" crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. All part of the Con spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC