LeftishBrit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-17-09 06:29 PM
Original message |
G20 officer questioned on suspicion of Ian Tomlinson manslaughter ... |
|
Second postmortem into G20 death finds Ian Tomlinson suffered abdominal haemorrhage rather than heart attack.
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/17/ian-tomlinson-g20-manslaughter-questioning -
|
Frau Schmidt
(12 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-18-09 04:38 AM
Response to Original message |
1. How can you trust anything they say? |
|
1 April 2009: Ian Tomlinson dies around 19:30.
1 April: At 23:36, the Met says protesters attacked them while police fought to save him.
2 April: Newspapers lead with that angle. IPCC will "assess the circumstances."
3 April: Post mortem: Tomlinson died of a heart attack.
3 April: The Guardian tells City of London Police it has photos of Tomlinson lying at the feet of riot police.
4 April: City of London Police say Tomlinson died of natural causes.
5 April: Guardian publishes photos and testimony that Tomlinson was hit by police.
5 April: IPCC says Guardian has upset the family. Tells journalists there is "nothing in the story."
6 April: IPCC confirms that Tomlinson had contact with the police. It appeals for witnesses.
7 April: At 2 am, Guardian receives video showing Tomlinson was hit by an officer. Publishes it that afternoon on its website.
8 April: IPCC removes police from the inquiry.
9 April: IPCC suspends the officer in question. A second post mortem is conducted. IPCC says no CCTV cameras near the assault.
14 April: CCTV cameras near the assault found by Evening Standard. Second post mortem: Tomlinson died from an abdominal haemorrhage, not heart attack.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 03:44 PM
Response to Original message |