Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DfID Iraq staff 'sat in tents'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU
 
Hopeless Romantic Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:19 PM
Original message
DfID Iraq staff 'sat in tents'
The Iraq war enquiry has heard that Department for International Development staff in Iraq did very little in the aftermath of the war.

Admiral Lord Boyce, former Chief of the Defence Staff said that the armed forces did much of the reconstruction work and that DfID wasn't sure if Iraqis "were poor enough to deserve aid."

He told the enquiry: "You had people on the ground who were excellent operators from DfID who were told to sit in a tent and not to do anything because that was the instruction they received."

Clare Short, then International Development Secretary, was vocal at the time in her opposition to the invasion of Iraq, and said that Britain should not go to war without a second UN resolution.

She has also said in the past that claims of her hindering reconstruction were inaccurate and misleading.

However, Lord Boyce said that he thought "DfID were particularly uncooperative, as led by Clare Short."

Sir Kevin Tebbit, a former senior Ministry of Defence civil servant also said: "DfID felt a second UN resolution was absolutely essential before they could agree to do anything. That meant that it was only late in the day that we were able to get them fully engaged.

"Their focus on poverty relief rather than backing a strategic objective of the British government meant they were not sure at first the Iraqi people were quite poor enough to deserve major DfID aid."

He said that Prime Minister Tony Blair had "to finally hammer out the terms of proper support."

http://www.publicservice.co.uk/news_story.asp?id=11513



Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Jeneral2885 Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Iraq
wasnt meant to be a DFID target--and it eventually sucked away all the resources that could have gone to better use in other developing countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC