Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Voters: Count Ballots by Hand

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 01:05 AM
Original message
Voters: Count Ballots by Hand

Voters: Count ballots by hand

Petition article to prohibit computerized vote counting passes

By Nick Martin
Monadnock Ledger-Transcript

LYNDEBOROUGH — By approving a petition warrant article at Saturday’s Town Meeting, Lyndeborough voters made their town perhaps the first in the nation to formally prohibit computerized vote counting and ensure the tradition of hand counting paper ballots.

Voters approved the petition article that “prohibits vote counting concealed from human eye by method of computers.” Resident Nancy Tobi, who sponsored the petition article, said she brought the article to the town to ensure Lyndeborough would continue to count its ballots by hand, as it has for more than 200 years.

snip

“The decision to use an optical scan counting machine is up to the town. Every ballot is still cast on paper,” Scanlan said on Wednesday.

http://www.ledgertranscript.com/article/voters-count-ballots-by-hand

Refresh | +8 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. We do.
hand counted, open process, carefully supervised........and the results come before midnight in most places.

It works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AtLiberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. A better way to frame this issue...
...is *not* to demand hand-counted paper ballots. There are always arguments against them. Ballots tossed in the river stories... Ballots found in a box in the back room stories... You've heard 'em.

The way to frame this is to demand a 100 percent transparent electoral process. When asked what process is acceptable, just repeat, "Anything that is 100 percent transparent is acceptable." Of course, the only one that meets that criteria is hand-counted paper ballots. It's a way of saying exactly what you want without dealing with the usual comments. It's also a way to highlight that we don't have transparent voting process in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. it is less complex
but admittedly even New Hampshire's general election ballots are much simpler than the rest
of the country's.

NH recently eliminated straight ticket voting and that may increase time to count votes a bit.

In a presidential election, NH ballot has about 12 contests on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. "...the rest of the country..."?
How about "a lot of other places, but certainly not all..."?

If the election is such that it can be hand-counted, it's of value to consider doing so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
diva77 Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. what sort of election can't be hand-counted??
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Exactly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. watch the video of the meeting
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 12:07 AM by WillYourVoteBCounted
VIDEO: Lyndeborough bans computerized voting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXOg3OZfGpw

Nancy Tobi advises that having a simpler ballot makes it more feasible to HCPB in New Hampshire.
She says that a jurisidiction would want to reduce the number of contests in one election in order
to have a simpler ballot.

In 2004 in North Carolina, we had a few HCPB counties, and as our ballot is quite long, (24 contests) they ended up finishing the count the next day.

In California, often a GE ballot may have several pages of contests.

The issue is that politicians like to have their contests on big ballots.

So in NH there were fewer obstacles to over come.

Remember, while it is very important to count votes publicly and accurately, it is
also important to count them promptly.

You have to address all issues, and you have to be able to either get such a charter passed or
otherwise build momentum for such a change,
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Clyde39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. We KNOW we can't trust the machines
So this is the obvious answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC