Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Three physicists come up with a vaccination strategy.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 01:06 PM
Original message
Three physicists come up with a vaccination strategy.
Edited on Mon Jan-03-11 01:07 PM by Jim__
I'm not sure why physicists are addressing this problem. Under certain conditions, does this seem like a better approach than current approaches:

"To reduce the infection spread, one can vaccinate all possible susceptible individuals. If they are all willing to be vaccinated and there is enough vaccine for everybody, the vaccination campaign will eradicate the disease with certainty. Very often, however, a large portion of susceptible individuals refuse to be vaccinated. In addition, a vaccine can be in short supply, expensive to produce, or difficult to store."

How to cope with such conditions is the problem tackled by the three physicists: Meerson from the Hebrew University and Prof. Mark Dykman and Dr. Michael Khasin from Michigan State University in the US. (Although presently working in the US, Dr. Khasin earned his doctorate at the Hebrew University.)

The researchers made use of the fact that, even without vaccination, a disease ultimately becomes extinct on its own. But for large populations, the typical time it takes for the disease to disappear by itself can be very long. Essentially, Meerson and colleagues suggested an optimal vaccination strategy that accelerates, in the maximum possible way, this natural process of disease disappearance.

In this strategy, the vaccine must be delivered to the most susceptible populations (say children in a particular class where a certain percentage of the pupils have come down with the flu) in the form of short but intensive vaccination periods, adjusted to match the "ups and downs" of waves that occur in the natural spread of infectious disease.

more ...

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Disease for which there is only a human host* become extinct...
Edited on Mon Jan-03-11 01:14 PM by hlthe2b
where there are other animal reservoirs, that is not the case. That is why the only successful disease eradication program thus far has been smallpox (with polio moving towards that goal). Measles, likewise could be eliminated and potentially eradicated with enough resources and substantial effort. Other viruses, with closely related strains affecting any number of animal species, are not really amenable to eradication, (short of removing every single possible "susceptible") even where effective vaccines currently exist.

*and where non-human primates are not naturally infected outside the laboratory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. The value of undertanding systems of equations
Last week someone asked about how algebra is practical and in particular how solving systems of equations was relevant to the world.

Also note that modelling of disease using S-I-R models isn't a new way to seek optimal strategies for ending outbreaks, so this isn't exactly a new area. Indeed, Ronald Ross used an S-I-R model in the 1890's to consider the epidemiology of malaria.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC