Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Advocacy Group Says Justices May Have Conflict in Campaign Finance Cases

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Justice Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 11:50 AM
Original message
Advocacy Group Says Justices May Have Conflict in Campaign Finance Cases
WASHINGTON — When the conservative financier Charles Koch sent out invitations for a political retreat in Palm Springs later this month, he highlighted past appearances at the gathering of “notable leaders” like Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas of the Supreme Court.

A leading liberal group is now trying to use that connection to argue that Mr. Scalia and Mr. Thomas should disqualify themselves from hearing campaign finance cases because they may be biased toward Mr. Koch, a billionaire who has been a major player in financing conservative causes.

The group, Common Cause, filed a petition with the Justice Department on Wednesday asking it to investigate potential conflicts by Justices Scalia and Thomas and move for their disqualification from the landmark Citizens United case, in which the court last year lifted a ban on corporate spending on political campaigns. Common Cause also cited the role of Mr. Thomas’s wife, Virginia Thomas, in forming a conservative political group opposed to the Obama administration as grounds for his disqualification.

The petition is a new tack for opponents of the court’s decision in the Citizens United case. Common Cause, by its own acknowledgment, faces a difficult task in getting the justices’ to remove themselves from the case and seeking to have the Citizens United decision itself vacated.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/20/us/politics/20koch.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha23
Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's a clear conflict of interest.
But Scalia and Thomas have no sense of justice. Really. Imagine, justices on the highest court in the land with no sense of justice. But it is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They got to the court on a mission that they are now fulfilling. It's way beyond simple
conflict of interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Scalia will never admit a conflict. He is always right, always. Just ask him.
He has said that his opinions are always correct and the justices who disagree are, well, always wrong. He cheerfully admitted this in an interview that I believe was on PBS a few years ago. And Thomas always votes with him. So, there. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Scalia = arrogant asshole! n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Justice Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC