Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report rips police spying on parade group (Santa Cruz)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Civil Liberties Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 09:15 PM
Original message
Report rips police spying on parade group (Santa Cruz)
By KEN MCLAUGHLINSan Jose Mercury NewsSanta Cruz police ''more than likely'' violated the civil rights of organizers of a zany New Year's Eve parade by using undercover officers to monitor their planning meetings, the city's police auditor says.

The auditor, Palo Alto attorney Robert Aaronson, concludes in a 34-page report that police were too quick to send two undercover cops, posing as surfer dudes, to infiltrate three meetings over a two-month period in late 2005.

One such option suggested by Aaronson: telephoning parade planners to see what they were up to.

The controversy began after the city decided it could no longer afford to pay for First Night Santa Cruz, an alcohol-free New Year's Eve celebration that for years kept the downtown safe for families. So a small group of artists vowed to stage a ''do-it-yourself'' parade with no official organizers or parade permits. <snip>

http://www.montereyherald.com/mld/montereyherald/news/14166736.htm

D@mn! An alcohol-free New Year's Eve party! Better make sure they're not violent extremists ...
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
400Years Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. this is the raison d’être of cops, to protect the rulers
Law, Justice, Order, that is all just bullshit meant for you and me

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. It would seem
that this whole thing could have been avoided if the DIY group had gotten a parade permit just like everyone else has to. Or am I misreading something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Civil Liberties Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC