Men build small flying spy drone that cracks Wi-Fi and cell data

[formercia]

Men build small flying spy drone that cracks Wi-Fi and cell data
Digital TrendsBy Mike Flacy | Digital Trends – Sat, Jul 30, 2011


Built by Mike Tassey and Richard Perkins, the Wireless Aerial Surveillance Platform (otherwise known as the WASP) is a flying drone that has a 6-foot wingspan, a 6-foot length and weighs in at 14 pounds. The small form factor of the unmanned aerial vehicle allows it to drop under radar and is often mistaken for a large bird. It was built from an Army target drone and converted to run on electric batteries rather than gasoline. It can also be loaded with GPS information and fly a predetermined course without need for an operator. Taking off and landing have to be done manually with the help of a mounted HD camera. However, the most interesting aspect of the drone is that it can crack Wi-Fi networks and GSM networks as well as collect the data from them.

It can accomplish this feat with a Linux computer on-board that’s no bigger than a deck of cards. The computer accesses 32GB of storage to house all that stolen data. It uses a variety of networking hacking tools including the BackTrack toolset as well as a 340 million word dictionary to guess passwords. In order to access cell phone data, the WASP impersonates AT&T and T-Mobile cell phone towers and fools phones into connecting to one of the eleven antenna on-board. The drone can then record conversations to the storage card and avoids dropping the call due to the 4G T-mobile card routing communications through VOIP.

Amazingly, this was accomplished with breaking a single FCC regulation. The drone relies on the frequency band used for Ham radios to operate. Not wanting to get into legal trouble with AT&T and T-Mobile, they tested the technology in isolated areas to avoid recording phone conversations other than their own. The duo play to discuss how to build the WASP at the DEFCON 19 hacking conference.

http://news.yahoo.com/men-build-small-flying-spy-drone-cracks-wi-172803720.html


Pretty neat. DoD would have spent Billions to do the same thing.

[williesgirl]

1. Unless I'm misunderstanding, what's neat about something that inevitably will be used against us?

[formercia]

3. The technology is neat

Our wireless networks are already compromised. We even sell systems to the likes of Iraq, so it can't be classified.
What amazes me is that they were able to pack it in that small space and still have it fly.

The technology for your cell phone was paid for by the CIA.

[druidity33]

2. How did they get

an Army target drone to work with?

:shrug:

[formercia]

4. Probably surplus.

They could have built one, but it saves time on the learning curve.