Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Exascale computing seen in this decade (computerworld)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 08:34 PM
Original message
Exascale computing seen in this decade (computerworld)
By Patrick Thibodeau
November 16, 2011 09:21 AM ET

Computerworld - SEATTLE -- At the supercomputing conference here, there's an almost obsessive focus on developing an exascale computing system -- one that would be roughly 1,000 times more powerful than any existing system -- before the end of the decade.

In the lives of most people, something that's expected to happen eight or nine years in the future might seem like a long ways away, but here at SC11, it feels as if the end of the decade and the arrival of exascale computing are just around the corner. Part of the push is coming from the U.S. Department of Energy, which will fund the development of these massive systems. The DOE told the industry this summer that it wants an exascale system delivered in the 2019-2020 time frame that won't use more than 20 megawatts of power. The government has been seeking proposals about how to achieve that goal.

To put 20MW in perspective, consider the supercomputer that IBM is building for the DOE's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Expected to be capable of operating at speeds of up to 20 petaflops, it will be one of the largest supercomputers in the world -- and one of the most energy efficient. When it's completely turned on next year, it will still use somewhere in the range of 7 to 8 megawatts of power, according to IBM. An exascale system would have 1,000 petaflops of computing power. (A petaflop is a quadrillion floating-point operations per second.)

"We're in a power-constrained world now," said Steve Scott, CTO of Nvidia's Telsa business. "The performance we can get on a chip is constrained not by the number of transistors we can put on a chip, but rather by the power."

Scott says x86 CPU technology is limited by its overhead processes. Graphics processing units (GPU), in contrast, provide throughput with very little overhead, and use less energy per operation.
***
more: http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9221883/Exascale_computing_seen_in_this_decade?taxonomyId=12
Refresh | +7 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good God.
"Expected to be capable of operating at speeds of up to 20 petaflops"

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
cojoel Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 20 petaflops is the one IBM is currently building at Livermore
For the end of the decade target, "an exascale system would have 1,000 petaflops of computing power. (A petaflop is a quadrillion floating-point operations per second.)" Wow, 50 times more, with a power envelope of only 3x more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC