Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The "freedom to be born"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU
 
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 07:48 PM
Original message
The "freedom to be born"?
Where are they deriving this freedom? Is it a constitutional concept or another attempt to inject Evangelicalism into law? Or pretend it was some kind of idea from the Framers.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. You'll have to tell us more, if you expect somekind of answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I'm in a debate about FOCA- elsewhere
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 08:13 PM by rusty charly
and this phrase was thrown at me. Never heard it. When I googled it, it's all Anti-Choice marches, Catholic websites, Steve Forbes (!), etc. I responded with the slippery slope of granting a grouping of three cells complete Constitutional rights. But, thought I might get a more legal or detailed or researched response than what I first came up with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Ok, so? Do spontaneously miscarried zygotes, blastocysts & fetuses have rights of inheritance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Freedom to inspect any vagina at any time for any reason on any suspicion.
At the drop of a hat, so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Vagina Freedom's Receptacle
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 08:01 PM by StClone
Anti-abortion Whack jobs will witness the end of the world before they will concede that abortion is what is -- none of their damn business unless they are having one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Blasphemers one and all and I'm NOT kidding about that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Veritas_et_Aequitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Injecting Evangelicalism into law.
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 08:00 PM by Veritas_et_Aequitas
I'm guessing the logic is:

Assume: Embryos and unborn forms of human life are legal persons
Assume: All legal persons are entitled to full rights guaranteed under the Constitution including the implied rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as stated in the Declaration of Independence and covered under the 9th amendment.

Therefore: Embryos et al are protected by the Constitution.
Therefore: Embryos have an inherent right to life.
Therefore: Embryos have a freedom under the 9th amendment as to protect their right to life.

At least I think that's what they're shooting for.

Edited because I always confuse the 9th and 10th amendments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ChazII Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. You wrote a good summary. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. injecting reality into reality
"Assume: All legal persons are entitled to full rights guaranteed under the Constitution including the implied rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as stated in the Declaration of Independence and covered under the 9th amendment."


When do women get the same rights as the "unborn"?!

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. By storks and in cabbage patches
is inviolate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Every sperm is sacred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Uh-oh
So all those unimbedded eggs that get washed out in monthly menstrual flows are having their rights violated by - uh, wait, I can do this - by the homicidal maniac that is Mother Nature?

In that case, we must imprison every fertile female and make sure she doesn't menstruate.

There. I know I could go insane long enough to come up with this post.

Thank you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. They deny the existence of a woman as a separate
and fully formed human being who wants to protect her life against an unwanted pregnancy.

Only by denying the humanity of women does their stupid argument make any sense at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. The insane, RW fundies are trying to frame the argument again.
These are the same minds that came up with the concept that THEY are pro-life, while those of us who believe in FREEDOM OF CHOICE, are actually murderers!!!
The insanity of it all is mind boggling.
The hypocrisy is sickening. These "PRO-LIFERS" - actually anti-choice - are the same people who are rabid supporters of capital punishment and the rush to war. They are against prenatal health care for the mother, post-natal care for the baby, as well as education, housing and food for the child after it has left the womb.

The only life they are really "FOR" is that within a woman's womb. Other than that, they could not give a crap who lives, dies, starves, freezes to death, or gets killed by an IED in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. try telling the insurance company that they have to pay in full for a death
when your pregnancy naturally aborts ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. No. The "freedom to control women" is what it's about. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC