Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-04-09 08:44 PM
Original message |
I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro. |
|
I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro. I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro. I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro. I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro. I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro.
Darn nice unit.
I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro. I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro. I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro. I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro. I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro.
Please save me.
I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro. I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro. I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro. I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro. I am not going to buy the 17" Macbook Pro.
Want.
|
alfredo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-05-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sat Dec-05-09 11:35 AM by alfredo
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-05-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Edited on Sat Dec-05-09 02:33 PM by Deja Q
I'm tryin' not to...
But with a 6 month cycle, I suspect it is best to wait until the end of next month... the model might drop to a proper price or be supplanted with a model that would give the quad-core i7 HP lappy a run for its money -- one I almost bought...
|
alfredo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-05-09 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. They might be in sync with the Intel Tic Toc cycle, like they |
|
do with the OS: Big update, small update.
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-05-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. True. They did the small update in June... |
|
Nearly bought that model today. It's the only one that, with a 17" screen, has a proper resolution (1920x1200).
I could save $600 by going refurb and getting AppleCare instead of paying full price and adding best buy's warranty...
But, with January, and their updates usually being 6 months apart, there is no pressing need to splurge.
I saw the almost-comparable Windows laptops. Better in a couple ways, but it's a lesser CPU, made of plastic, and lower resolution despite having a faster video subsystem with more RAM. Plus, going back to Windows, any money I save from hardware gets spent on Photoshop filters for Windows - the net price, either way, for me, is the same.
So, yeah, January - I can wait. I hope Apple is cooking up something good -- the 17" MBP, with a TN-based panel, makes precision photo editing pointless, but there are other genuinely useful things it can do...
|
alfredo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-05-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Since I've retired I've had to go from a Pro model down to a |
|
mac Mini. It needs more RAM, and I will do that in a month or so. I'm without Photoshop too. Leopard killed the old PS7, so I do everything on GIMP.
It's a lot better than the GIMP 1.2 I used back in the good old days.
|
Lost-in-FL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-05-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
You will always regret it if you don't.
|
Hissyspit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-06-09 02:23 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Well, I have one and it's changed my life. |
|
O.K. that may be a bit much, but you should definitely get one.
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-06-09 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I have a 15.4" MBP and a Mac Pro (single quad) already... The 17" DOES have legitimate |
|
pluses (e.g. 1920x1200 resolution for more screen estate for designing pages, though I wouldn't do photo editing on it due to it being a 6-bit TN panel...)
But with the quarter ending and Apple likely to put out a major update by February, I think it's worth waiting for. (I can easily see the current 17" model going down to $1999.)
Then again, the next series model might be 17.3" and have a naff 1600x900 resolution.
|
Hissyspit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-06-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. I'm looking at 1920 x 1200 right now and it's great. I'm not sure I understand the issue with photo |
|
editing, but I don't know exactly what you do with it. I assume you are a professional graphics designer. I always look straight on at the screen, but maybe I'm the only one who can live with this, and I prefer LCD aesthetically, but maybe I shouldn't! Maybe I am too forgiving of color differences in the hard print. It is true that it goes hinky vertically. Do you prefer the glossy or matte screen and would that make a difference? My understanding has been that the TN 6-bit screens Apple uses are the BEST TN 6-bit screens out there, but maybe I have just fallen for propaganda. I know they use different manufacturers. I'm talking quality control.
I dare not give advice on the advisibility of waiting.
Naff? Are you British, Deja Q? I used to have a British girlfriend and I NEVER heard her say it or maybe I did and didn't know what I was hearing!
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-08-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. I'm in school right now, training to be a graphics designer. (Already a pro photographer) |
|
I do know the June refresh MBPs have even better panels, which means it's another reason for me to buy sooner rather than later. Not that my current 15" (early 2009) is anything to sneeze at; the larger size is for work area and ergonomics...
Looking straight ahead is definitely the best for any TN panel. :D
I do prefer matte when possible; the glossy screens reflect light and can make images look brighter than how they should be.
Am I British? I wish! My ancestry is, however. Predominantly Scottish, actually... Additionally, growing up watching lots of British programming on PBS helped me cultivate an appreciation for the language, both written and verbal... Remember that "Where's Waldo" game? Well, with me it's similar except the fun part is to decipher when I use UK vernacular and when I go back into "American mode"... :D
|
davidwparker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-06-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Oh, that I could. But, I cannot. Looks like you have it bad. |
|
Give in. Give in. Give in. Give in. Give in.
Yes it is.
Give in. Give in. Give in. Give in. Give in.
I cannot.
Give in. Give in. Give in. Give in. Give in.
Get.
|
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-07-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Resistance is futile. Mine is perfect. |
|
17-inch MacBook Pro, 8GB DRAM, 3.06GHz, 500GB Drive@7200rpm, Antiglare Widescreen Display.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:30 PM
Response to Original message |