Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Any input for us Royal Wedding freaks? Astrology or readings?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Religion & Spirituality » Astrology, Spirituality & Alternative Healing Group Donate to DU
 
FirstLight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-11 04:08 PM
Original message
Any input for us Royal Wedding freaks? Astrology or readings?
Since this week is full of *All Things Royal* on ALL Channels... our own 'channels' here should have their fair shake. ;)

Soooooo....is anyone getting any Hits? Rick or Stella, any Astrology insights with Wills and the Country?

It was interesting for me to watch the footage of Diana, I was only 11 when the wedding happened. And I vividly remember crying on the phone watching the late breaking news of her car accident...quite a strange 'lookingglass' moment to be watching her child preparing to marry.

just wanting other's input:
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm getting a much better feeling about William & Kate
than I did about Charles & Diana. I told my mom when that engagement was announced that she'd never be Queen. I don't think Charles will ever be King either, but who knows?

What's really weird is this: When I was very young (like maybe 10 or so) I had a dream in which Charles never became king, but Andrew did. Not sure why I tapped into that, I wasn't really a royal watcher at that age. An alternate reality? :shrug: Still get that feeling, although it seems less likely to happen now that William is getting married & will be having kids soon. :)

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. I don't believe Charles will ever be King, either
Isn't there some question as to whether Camilla can actually be Queen? They're both divorced. The King of England is still considered Defender of the Faith, and it would be difficult at best. Of course, IMHO.

I think Charles will abdicate in favor of William, especially if he and Kate have children in the next couple of years.

IMHO.

Okay, who's staying up all night to watch the wedding? ;-)

-MV
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Me, unless my plans change & I decide to sleep
:rofl:

I was lucky with Diana's wedding. My mom stayed up all night & only woke me when she showed up in the carriage. I remember thinking "OMG, *THAT'S* her dress?" :wtf: For all the fuss they made over it, it was too simple & the train was way too long.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Too simple?? I don't mean to start an argument,
but Diana's dress was ludicrously over the top huge and ruffled. I thought then, and I still think that it's one of the all time ugliest wedding dresses ever. The dress wore her, she did not wear the dress. I've read that Camilla was influential in persuading Diana to go with such an awful dress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. in terms of beadwork, etc, it was incredibly plain
and that train was just omg :wtf: who okay'd that?

Contrast Diana's dress with the one worn by Sarah Ferguson---now THAT was the dress Diana should have worn.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. I think the dress was both boring and yet had too much fabric, in the wrong places. I was
also disappointed when I saw the dress, considering all the hoopla before the wedding.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Huh?
Edited on Wed Apr-27-11 07:46 AM by Dulcinea
Simple?? That dress was WAY too much! It smothered her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. It was dull as dishwater & ugly to boot
the only thing "outstanding" about it was the ridunkulously long train.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Diana/Sarah gown comparison
Diana's (I take back what I said about no beadwork. There is. A bit)



Sarah's (she got the better groom, and the better dress)



dg

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. She prefers "Princess Consort."
From what little I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. gotta say
pretty interesting that the Obamas aren't invited and that they are creating their own news by attending the last shuttle launch at the same time. Okay so I listened to Richard Hoagland on C ot C the other day and he was mentioning that Obama had been purposefully snubbing England lately because of their being the banking elite and all. It all had to do with symbols and his making a speech from the Blue Room rather than the Oval Office (?????) Not sure what to make of it........it made sense in the middle of the night. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I thought POTUS and Mrs. POTUS said
.... they weren't going to attend because they didn't want the security drama that having them there would entail.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think that was the Brit's story
But I guess it sounds better if it was mutual. Security may have been a concern, though.

Michelle had been quoted as saying she would go if she were invited.

:shrug: Me too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Sounds perfectly reasonable.
And Mrs. Potus is a/k/a FLOTUS!!!!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. It's not a State event
Edited on Tue Apr-26-11 09:56 AM by WolverineDG
as Charles' wedding to Diana was, since he is first in line to the throne. William is #2, so his wedding is not a State event. IOW, it's William's & Kate's call as to who they wanted to invite. I think it's quite possible that the question whether to invite or not invite the Obamas was handled via back-channels & it was decided, for security reasons, not to invite them. If they had been invited & declined, can you imagine what the howler monkeys on Faux would do with that? Oh the humanity!

No, it's better that they weren't "officially" invited & the last launch of the Space Shuttle makes for a good cover story. (can't tell you how depressed I am that we are folding our space program)

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ricochet21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. A horrible time to get married
the way the planets are arranged, but I give them no special reality. They're just folks like us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FirstLight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I know! ...any 'good' stuff for them?
Edited on Tue Apr-26-11 12:35 PM by FirstLight
I get a better feeling about their future, and that they may have a better shot at a good life...but the current state of things is not very conducive to long term anything, much less happiness.
do we know what sign they each are?

here's his chart... http://www.astrotheme.com/celestar/portrait.php?info=1&clef=233rFYDV7Mf6

and hers http://www.astrotheme.com/celestar/portrait.php?clef=S6BJc5t6rQM5&info=1


interesting...he's a gemini/sag (or cap? rising)
she's aa cap/aries rising...

pretty balanced, huh? but i am an amateur and just took a cursory glance
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. His chart says he's Cancer.
It looks like the sun had just moved into Cancer, but there it is, according the chart zero degrees, 06 minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ricochet21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. He was born during an eclipse in Gemini
I remember

I really can't give them any focus becauses the "Royalty" needs to be ignored and fade away, I'm sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. You may be in dire need of more than one of these. . .
http://www.lydialeith.com/

Act now !!! Supplies are limited !!!

tah dah !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hope no one manages to disturb the process.
You gotta know someone out there is interested in gaining attention through negative input. Hopefully the Guard will keep things stable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Yay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
16. I'm sorry to post that I don't have a good feeling about Kate Middleton's safety.
Edited on Wed Apr-27-11 01:01 AM by BlueIris
And I haven't had a good feeling about William for years now. Here's hoping for the best for them both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kookaburra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
23. Beautiful!!!
And her dress is gorgeous!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Yes, very lovely & elegant!
And no "surprises" thankfully!

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. I loved her gown.
Elegant, simple & classy. I don't care for ruffles & froufrou, & I'm SICK of strapless wedding dresses! I hope the new Princess Kate starts a trend!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. ITA. Strapless wedding gowns are godawful.
Most of the people I see trying to pull them off...can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FirstLight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
26. niiiice!
I enjoy a good wedding, carriages and pomp...and her dress was awesome, VERY grace kelly ...actually teared up during the vows and seeing their faces so open and shining with promise and love.

I don;t care what you think of manarchy, these kids have something about them. an ease, and understanding and compassion...maybe they will make some positive changes in their lifetimes. In fact, i'd be willing to bet on it. (you know they asked people to donate to charities instead of giving gifts...and they also are donating all leftover food from the reception to the homeless in london. sound slike some would say it's a "let them eat cake" moment, but i think it shows their character that they even acknowledge the less fortunate.)

didn't manage to wake up early, thank goodness for modern technology and replay!

best of luck Will & Kate! :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PhillyGurl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. Anyone else agree that Victoria Beckham looked like an antelope?
I can't stand the two of them, they are so overblown and full of themselves. :puke:

Props to Wills & Kate, they are a cute couple, and seem to genuinely care for each other. Yes, I watched Diana and Charles' wedding in 1981 (I was 6 mos. pregnant with my daughter) Missed this one but have seen the reruns. Adorable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. I didn't understand Victoria's hat, and I love hats.
She should wear the hat ON her head, not precariously balanced on her forehead. If anything, she looked like a seal balancing a ball.

Also, she is pregnant. She should be careful about what kind of shoes she wears. Those shoes were six inches high. That is dangerously high for a pregnant woman.

Usually, I find Victoria very stylish. I am not so sure this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kookaburra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. It was likely a fascinator
They're decorated headbands (basically) that look like little tiny hats (or birds' nests, or in the case of Princess Eugenie, a Flying Spaghetti Monster) perched oddly on your head. Cute and sometimes stylish, they're sort of a nose thumb to the snobby hat crowd (IMHO).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
31. VERY interesting take on it incl. astrology:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Yes, that is interesting (especially b/c the author suggests the couple did 'astro-planning'.)
Edited on Sun May-01-11 03:51 AM by BlueIris
I think they picked an awful time and date to get married and my first thought looking at the chart was, "Don't they use astrologers?" Someone should have red flagged this choice as a huge no-no. So I was fascinated to read that an astrologer thinks astrology was used.

I still don't have a good feeling about Kate Middleton's long term safety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Religion & Spirituality » Astrology, Spirituality & Alternative Healing Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC