enlightenment
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 12:51 PM
Original message |
Unbelievers versus Nonbelievers. |
|
Maybe I'm just being a little cranky this morning, but is anyone else bothered by the word 'unbeliever'?
Petty, I know . . . and I'm not horribly, horribly bothered. Just enough to post the question . . .
|
beam me up scottie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-20-09 01:03 PM by beam me up scottie
Begs the question
|
prostock69
(365 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 01:08 PM
Response to Original message |
2. No, I'm not upset by it. I'm just thrilled we got mentioned at all! |
|
I can't remember a past president that ever admitted that we existed are deserved to be called "equal" with the believers. I was very happy.
|
beac
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I heard "nonbeliever"... does the text of the speech say "un"? |
|
As an atheist vegetarian, I'm pretty used to being outside the mainstream. Nice that Obama mentioned us. Took a TINY, TINY portion of the stink of Warren away. ;)
|
Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I heard "nonbelievers" too. nt |
varkam
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
charlie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
immoderate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message |
laconicsax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I'd prefer something non-negative. |
|
Non-believer (or unbeliever) implies that you're supposed to believe and we're a subversive group that doesn't.
|
Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. Well, atheist means the same thing. |
|
Anyway, I think the term was meant to include atheisits, agnostics, pantheists, realists and skeptics generally.
I know what you mean, of course. Like how did I become a "non-smoker" when I have nothing to do with smoking? Unfortunately, when something is a typical point of view, the easiest way to describe nonconformity is to define it by an absence of that point of view. I was glad to hear a national leader acknowledge that nonbelief is a legitimate point of view.
|
varkam
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. At least he didn't refer to us as "brights". |
ihavenobias
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
enlightenment
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Okay - I'll go back to keeping my mouth shut now. |
|
Listened to it again - it was non-, not un-
I apparently was having a moment . . . I could have sworn he said 'un-'
*now I'll wander around for the next few days convinced I have a brain tumor or something . . .*
Sorry about that.
*maybe I was warped from listening to Warren. That was icky.*
PS - I do think there is a BIG difference, which is why I got my panties in a bit of a wad.
|
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-09 07:50 PM
Response to Original message |
|
because he acknowledged we exist and we're part of the country, too.
It's high bloody time.
|
beam me up scottie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |
14. I didn't bother editing my post when I realized my mistake because it doesn't really matter. |
|
I am a little bugged by either label but at least we got an honorable mention.
|
pauliedangerously
(843 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-25-09 04:45 PM
Response to Original message |
15. I wouldn't worry too much about it... |
|
Most believers don't do nuance very well, hence the juxtaposition of words like "creation science," or "intelligent design theory."
I don't remember which word I heard, but I was glad to hear him say it.
This brings up a very interesting point that I make in my rare religious discussions with goddies: As a nonbeliever, I devote a considerable amount of time pondering cosmic issues and seeking truth. An unbeliever, on the other hand, doesn't even stop to consider how it got here or seek out meaning for its existence.
I have a reason for being godless: no-one can give me a clear definition of what it is. Moreover, religious texts don't answer my questions nor to the interpreters of these texts. I read the Bible when I was a teenager and I was appalled by it. After all the hype I heard about what a great and inspiring book it was I couldn't look at people the same way after I read it. It was like a waking dream. They don't really believe that stuff; they couldn't, COULD they? You've got to be phracking kidding.
And so, here I am. Welcome to the twilight zone.....do-do-do-do, do-do-do-do, do-do-do-do.
I never get mad at them; I just pretend that we are different species; that I share a common ancestor with the chimpanzee and believers are direct descendants of gorillas or neanderthals or lizards or whatever makes me laugh at the time.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:21 PM
Response to Original message |