Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arrgh! got dust on my sensor. It's on my Canon G10, so there's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Arts & Entertainment » Photography Group Donate to DU
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-11 05:52 PM
Original message
Arrgh! got dust on my sensor. It's on my Canon G10, so there's
no way to get at it. Now what?

It's on the bottom right side. I can crop it out, or clean it in post processing. Still I don't like it one bit.

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
juxtaposed Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-11 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. u should be able to remove it? Have you checked out youtube
to see if anyone else has had the same thing happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-11 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks . I am going to try a vacuum. , but that will take some planning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. from what I read
the dust gets in those from the lens moving in and out... so it stands to reason a vacuum might pull it out the same way?

good luck, seems to be an issue with g9/10/11's judging from the many posts
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Here's something I found on you tube
This seems like a good idea, or a way to put more dust on the sensor.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laBX5N-ZFAU&feature=youtube_gdata_player


------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-11 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I have a feeling that, just like something else
sucking might be better than blowing
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The compressor uses oil to seal it, canned air might be
safer. I'm thinking of using the vacuum on the battery housing
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Alameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. sorry to read that, please keep us updated on your efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm hoping to cause enough turbulence to dislodge it. Until then
I will have to either crop it out or remove it in post processing. When the lens is wide open it is not as visible, but f7 and up it becomes more pronounced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I had that happen
and couldn't figure out a way to get rid of it. I finally had to take my camera in to have it cleaned, not a cheap propsition.

I'll be interested in seeing what ends up working for you as I certainly want to avoid the cleaning bill. Good luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I think it might spur me to buy a mirror-less camera
so I can clean the sensor when dirty. That's how I'm going to sell the purchase to my wife.

As it is now, I can work around it because it is located near the bottom right corner.

If Sigma has greatly improved AF speed on their new DP2x, I might spring for that. It's not an interchangeable lens camera, but image quality is excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
juxtaposed Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. never use canned air, You could fracture the sensor or leave a film over
the shield
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Yesterday I went out and did a shoot and the dust was hidden
by the details in the image. I avoided f8 and stayed below f5.6. The dust is easy to crop out, I just don't like having it there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'd consider vacuum instead of blasting
If you dislodge it, it'll just end up somewhere else in the camera, and it'll probably pop up again.

I didn't know this could happen. It never occured to me, and I'll be watching to see how you resolve it, just in case it ever happens to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I have a stronger vacuum I will try later after my nap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. So putting your lips around the lens
and inhaling violently isn't the solution?

Geez, I guess I won't go into the business.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Only if you can pass the garden hose golf ball test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. I'd suggest using a reducer to create a smaller opening in the hose.
You'll have a lower volume of air moving at a much higher speed, in other words, more vacuum pressure. Plus, the reducer will allow you to get in where a larger hose cannot. It wouldn't be too difficult to fabricate with a piece of narrow tubing and some duct tape.

Good luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. That was just what I was thinking. Just tried it, but it didn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't know if you can do this with your camera.
For some dust, I used to take the lens off, lock the mirror open while holding the camera pointing downwards and snapping a few pictures - the vibration was enough to loosen the dirt and allow it to fall out.

But that would not work with sticky dust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Can't take the lens off, its a fixed lens camera.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
juxtaposed Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. a few years ago I'd send my camera's out to be cleaned
I was paying about $35 each. A couple years ago I was on Cape Cod with two camera's that got dust over both sensors. I found this at a local shop for about $20..

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Esperanza!! This dust is on a point and shoot, the Canon G10.
So happy She won best new artist. It shows the Academy isn't as shallow as they appear.

I am looking for a good street camera. The Olympus E-Pl2/Sony NEX/Lumix GF2 look very good. I need something light because I do a lot of one hand work. I also have some muscle weakness due to an injury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
juxtaposed Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I'd look at response time with point and shoot, Touch the button and how
fast it shoots. I don't think there's a bad Point and shoot out there now. The faster the better, I would think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Shutter lag is one problem with p&s cameras. I want a bigger sensor
to give some better low light performance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
juxtaposed Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. buy used, check out CL local. A dslr is lite the lens is what weigh's
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Size and weight rule out many DSLR's for me. The Samsung NX10
Looks.good, with some caveats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I checked out the local CL ads, but there wasn't much worth
considering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
28. It will cost $150, to clean it. I will wait until more shows, or
I have enough to buy a new camera. This one will go to my wife. (I will still get it cleaned)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Arts & Entertainment » Photography Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC