Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congressman Mollohan(D-WV) rebuts GOP ethics charges over real estate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Democrats Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 11:06 AM
Original message
Congressman Mollohan(D-WV) rebuts GOP ethics charges over real estate
Edited on Tue Apr-25-06 11:14 AM by papau
MOLLOHAN STATEMENT:

"The Wall Street Journal today published an article which details some of the funding that I have secured for the 1st Congressional District through my position on the House Appropriations Committee.

"The article also reports on a complaint that has been filed against me by what the newspaper describes as a 'conservative' and 'self-styled' ethics-in-government' group.

"First, regarding my work on the House Appropriations Committee: since taking office in January 1983, my top priority has been to help my congressional district in every way possible. That remains my top priority to this day.

"I am proud of the nonprofit groups that have been established to address needs which exist in northern West Virginia, focusing on economic and community development. I have worked aggressively to secure funds to enable these groups to carry out their worthy missions. And by every measure I know, they have been highly effective in achieving the purposes for which they were created.

"These groups were not created to benefit me in any way, and they never have.

"Second, regarding the complaint the National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) asserts that it has prepared and forwarded to the U.S. attorney's office: I welcome any legitimate review of the financial disclosure statements that I have filed.

"My family has long invested in real estate and, like many Americans, the value of our real estate holdings has increased significantly in recent years. This is especially true of property owned in the Washington, D.C., area, which has experienced an unprecedented real estate boom.

"As with any complaint, it is important to consider the source. The NLPC has in the past targeted Democrats with charges that later proved to be without merit. NLPC has even attacked unions and the AARP for standing up for the interests of their members. I am sure that my position as top-ranking Democrat on the House Ethics Committee makes me a tempting target for such an ultra-conservative, politically motivated group.

"In fact, it is extremely telling that by its own admission, the NLPC initiated its review of my records in May 2005. That happens to be days after I successfully stood up to the House Republican leadership over their attempts to weaken the House ethics rules.

"Obviously, I am in the crosshairs of the National Republican Party and like-minded entities, such as the NLPC. They are angry at me and I fully expect that from now until November, they will continue to make baseless charges against me, my record and my family.

"While no one looks forward to such a thing, I will vigorously defend my service and not be intimidated by their heavy-handed tactics."

MOLLOHAN LETTER


April 7, 2006

The Honorable Tom Reynolds, Chairman

National Republican Congressional Campaign Committee

320 1st Street, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20003


Dear Chairman Reynolds:


This concerns the press release you issued earlier today, in your capacity as Chairman of the National Republican Congressional Campaign Committee, calling upon me to resign from the House Ethics Committee on the basis of the attack on me that was reported in this morning's Wall Street Journal.

Frankly, I am very grateful for your statement, for there is no action that could better illustrate both the entirely partisan, political nature of the attack that has been made upon me, and the reason that this attack has been made. Of course, the political motivation for the attack is entirely apparent in its source, which is the so-called "National Legal and Policy Center." As you are aware, NLPC is a politically motivated, ultra-conservative organization that, according to publicly available information, receives significant funding from ultra-conservative sources. Furthermore, as you are also probably aware, NLPC's so-called "Government Integrity Project" is directed almost exclusively against members of the Democratic Party. I must also note that similarly sensational charges that NLPC directed against Representative Jim Moran and Senator Maria Cantwell, among others, were found to have no merit whatsoever or were summarily dismissed. The NLPC has even attacked labor unions and the AARP for standing up for the rights of their members.

The fact that you have called upon me to resign from the House Ethics Committee, and the comments you made regarding my actions relating to the Committee in this Congress, illustrate the reason for this attack. The reason is, quite clearly, that I strongly opposed efforts by the Republican leadership that would have seriously undermined the ability of the Ethics Committee to perform its basic function of enforcing House rules and standards. What your statement cavalierly refers to as my "stall for so long in getting the Ethics Committee up and running" was, in fact, my opposition to those efforts to make unilateral, highly destructive changes both in the House rules governing the Committee and in the Committee staff.

According to a statement issued by NLPC, its efforts against me began in May 2005, which was immediately after the House finally voted to repeal the Ethics Committee rules changes that I had so strongly opposed. I am certain you will recall that vote, as you voted with me to repeal those rules changes.

I will continue to work to ensure that there will be an effective, credible ethics process in the House of Representatives, and I hope that all of my colleagues on the Ethics Committee will join me in that effort. I continue to hope that in this Congress we can have - as we had in the 108th Congress - an Ethics Committee that handles even the most sensitive, controversial issues on a unanimous or near-unanimous basis.

The remarks on this matter that were made by Speaker Hastert, which were similar to your own, have just been brought to my attention, and thus I am also sending him a copy of this letter.

Most sincerely,


Alan B. Mollohan


cc: The Honorable J. Dennis Hastert


According to the Wall Street Journal, Mollohan's household assets exponentially grew (from $565K in '00 to at least $6.3M in' 04). Can anyone trust the Wall Street Journal if it does not consider debt when calculating net worth?


http://www.cq.com/corp/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/govdoc20060414mollohan.pdf


Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm
Is this the person Nancy Pelosi asked to step down from the ethics committee? If so, what is she thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. She wanted him out of the spot light until everyone read the damn
disclosure forms - noted they are not net worth - noted the inheritance in 2001 - and noted the stupidity of demanding your holding in a company not be based on its net worth, but instead you should ignore the debt on the companies books and show a percentage of the assets controlled by the company.

INSANE - AND THE WASHINGTON POST EDITORIAL JUMPS ONTO THE GOP SIDE OF THIS.

I love our liberal media !

Hell, I'd settle for an intelligent media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Democrats Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC