Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Government Seizes Parody Comics At Customs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Reading & Writing » Comic Book Group Donate to DU
 
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 07:20 PM
Original message
U.S. Government Seizes Parody Comics At Customs
Edited on Sat Jan-22-05 07:33 PM by Kire
December 06, 2004
U.S. Government Seizes Parody Comics At Customs

On October 27, U.S. Customs sent a letter to Top Shelf Productions notifying them that copies of the anthology Stripburger had been seized, charging that the stories "Richie Bush" by Peter Kuper and "Moj Stub" (translated, "My Pole") by Bojan Redžić, constituted "clearly piratical copies" of registered and recorded copyrights. The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund has retained counsel to challenge these seizures.

"Richie Bush," appearing in Stripburger (Vol. 12) #37, is a four-page parody of Richie Rich, that also satirizes the Bush Administration by superimposing the personalities of the President’s cabinet on the characters from the comic. "My Pole," appearing in Stripburger (Vol. 3) # 4-5, which was published in 1994, is an eight-page ecology parable in Serbian that makes visual homage to Snoopy, Charlie Brown, and Woodstock in three panels. Customs seized five copies of the issue with the Peanuts reference and fourteen copies of the issue containing “Richie Bush.” The stories were both published in the middle of their respective issues and no graphics from either story appeared on the covers.

Top Shelf is the American agent for Stripburger, an Eastern European comics publisher that releases anthologies of comics from cartoonists around the globe. The comics that were seized were sent along as an extra in a shipment of The Miniburger Dirty Dozen, a boxed set of mini comics that Top Shelf imported to offer in the Direct Market and at conventions. Top Shelf did not order the seized issues of the anthology.

Upon investigating the shipment, Customs released the copies of Miniburger, but held the issues of Stripburger, giving Top Shelf thirty days to either forfeit the shipment, request administrative relief, or initiate court action.

More: http://www.cbldf.org/pr/archives/000237.shtml

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
1.  MORE ON THE CUSTOMS COMIC BOOK SEIZURE
MORE ON THE CUSTOMS COMIC BOOK SEIZURE

Writing for the Charleston City Paper, Jason Zwiker reported on the recent seizure of the Stripburger anthology by US Customs. While no new developments were reported (and as of press time, there has been no new action in the case, according to the CBLDF), Zwiker’s article does quote Richie Bush creator Peter Kuper as saying that his comic “Is a clear case of parody both of the Harvey comics characters and the current administration. I have never earned a dime from this parody and in fact had a number of out-of-pocket expenses. The purpose of this parody was to cast a light on the Bush administration’s policies and have a hearty laugh along the way. Lord knows, in times like these we could all use a good laugh.”

Zwiker also checks in with Charleston attorney Edward Fenno, who points out aspects of the case in regards to parody and fair use. Fenno is quoted as saying: “to be a protected against a copyright infringement claim, the author of a parody should at least loosely target the original (in this instance the Richie Rich comics) not just provide commentary on some other social issue by using the style and creativity of the original.”

The article also points out the 1997 case of The Cat NOT in the Hat, which was produced in the style of Dr. Suess’ works, but parodied the O.J. Simpson trial. In that case, a court found that the author of the work did not parody Suess’ style, but merely used the look and cadence of Dr. Suess’ works to get attention.

In that instance, when a copyrighted property is used to poke fun at another target, Fenno told Zwiker that the overall work then “receives less protection against copyright claims than parody. Satire can stand on its own two feet and so requires more justification for the act of borrowing” from the original copyrighted work, according to Judge O’Scannlain in his Dr. Seuss court opinion. Forsythe’s Food Chain Barbie photos were protected because they were ruled to not only critique objectification of women, but also to critique the Barbie doll as a propagator of that objectification.”

More: http://newsarama.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=23469
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Reading & Writing » Comic Book Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC