"Sexbots Logical Consequence of Human Evolution"

[bloom]

Men, at least those men who are pleased to cop to vulgarity and atavism, have maintained for quite a while now that they are hardwired to get it up for hot chicks. It's biology. There's nothing that they or anybody else can do about it. Male brains, they assert, have simply evolved to respond with pitched tents to stone cold, moist pink foxiness, and to recoil in abject horror from anything suggestive of non-receptacality.

Which is why they have invented porn, hookers, strip clubs, lipstick, stoned supermodels, spandex, labiaplasty, and TV shows where women in bikinis with huge jugs bounce on trampolines while gobbling handfuls of worms. They have created, in other words, a vast network of sexbots as a means to prevent, or at least buffer, men's accidental exposure to females or female images that might torment them with the repellent spectacle of unfeminine unfuckability....

Meanwhile, did you know there is such a thing as The Face Laboratory at Aberdeen University? Well, there is. It's right next to the Ass Laboratory. A Delphic cabal of highly specialized physiognomists sits around there all day pondering the esoterica of the human mug. Quoth the head cheese at the Face Laboratory on the subject of universal absolute feminine beauty: "Men from all cultures and all backgrounds find similar faces attractive. They are drawn to a babyish face and big baby-like eyes."

So you see, there is an evolutionary advantage for grown women to resemble toddlers.


http://twistyfaster.typepad.com/i_blame_the_patriarchy/patriarchyblaming/index.html

[Hello_Kitty]

1. That's a great blog isn't it?

I love Twisty Faster. She really nails it. Of course, that piece brought out some of the usual biological determinist patriarchy-defenders. The lengths people will go to in order to preserve the status quo are amazing. And for what? So that elite rich white guys at the top can keep everything, including all the supposedly "hot" women, to themselves. That's the reason (duh!) that all these ridiculous studies are churned out by researchers (wonder who funds them?) purporting to show that we needn't bother with criticism of objectifying women. It's biology, you know. Now shut up and put your makeup on. There's money to be made!! :eyes:

[bloom]

2. I just found it

This is funny - from the "about" page:

Congratulations! Your interest in blaming the patriarchy places you among some of the most elite blamers of our time. The most popular ideology in the world, patriarchy provides blamers, both hobbyists and professionals, with a rich and virtually endless supply of source material.

In order to make everyone's patriarchy-blaming experience more enjoyable, I have prepared the following pamphlet which touches briefly on some of I Blame The Patriarchy's standards and practices...


Comments

I Blame The Patriarchy is not a feminist primer. It is intended for advanced patriarchy-blamers. Novices, callow youths, and the Twist-curious are welcome to watch and learn, but are encouraged to put a sock in it until they have looked up "feminism" and "patriarchy" on their own time. Patriarchy-blaming ain't rocket science, but if you don't have at least a rudimentary familiarity with feminist theory, believe me, you'll embarrass us both....

Neither does it automatically fall upon me to defend the opinions of all other feminists. Therefore, if you have a beef with Andrea Dworkin that you feel invalidates feminism as a whole, I couldn't care less.

http://twistyfaster.com/pages/TheTwistyWay.htm

:)