Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge rejects use of Asperger's syndrome by defense in murder case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Health & Disability » Asperger's/PDD Group Donate to DU
 
kickysnana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 09:51 AM
Original message
Judge rejects use of Asperger's syndrome by defense in murder case
http://www.savagepacer.com/news/courts/judge-rejects-use-aspergers-syndrome-defense-murder-case-103

Scott County District Court Judge Mary Theisen issued her ruling Friday.

Attorneys for Michael John Anderson argued two weeks ago that he would be denied due process in his first-degree murder trial if the jury was not allowed to hear information about Asperger’s syndrome.

Defense attorney Alan Margoles said in an omnibus hearing in November 2008 that Anderson has been diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome and was “laboring under it” so that he “didn’t know the nature of his actions or that they were wrong.” Two weeks ago he asked the judge to allow the introduction of information into Anderson’s trial about Asperger’s, Margoles maintained the average person is not familiar with the developmental disorder, which is a form of autism.

But in her ruling, Theisen said the argument by the defense was insufficient to show that the Asperger’s syndrome, which was diagnosed by defense psychiatrists, had any effect on the murder. The judge also said that testimony on the syndrome might compel jurors to determine Anderson had a diminished mental capacity or responsibility, a defense "not recognized in Minnesota.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good. My teenage son is an aspie and
I am active in aspie awareness and promotion groups and in efforts to accept aspies for who and what they are and not try to "change" or "cure" them and other autistics. I have a MAJOR problem with attorneys attempting to use Asperger's as a defense. Not only is it wrong ethically, it gives the public the wrong impression and sets our cause back God knows how much. Aspies know very well the difference between right and wrong, maybe more so than a lot of people. When they commit a crime it has nothing to do with their "mental" status or sanity or whether they knew right from wrong. They aren't insane or mentally challenged and they certainly do know right from wrong. They need to be held to account like everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Health & Disability » Asperger's/PDD Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC