Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Call Pelosi: Tell Her To Reel Rahm In & Slap His Hands Off SS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 10:53 AM
Original message
Call Pelosi: Tell Her To Reel Rahm In & Slap His Hands Off SS
And, not to allow the telecoms to skate in the new FISA bill. It only takes a minute.

Nancy Pelosi

(202) 225-4965


Toll free #’s for Congress

(800) 862-5530
(800) 833-6354
(866) 340-9281
(866) 220-0044

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Very important!
Do it today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. You might want to review the new FISA bill before you call to complain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I Am Aware Of The Meeting That 75 Progressives Had
when they informed the leadership that they would fight immunity for the bill if the telecoms were allowed to skate. It was the reason Hoyer canceled his planned presser last week, he who is 2nd in the leadership and was prepared to give them a pass. There is still pressure from some to allow this to happen and we must continue to make the point by allowing our voices to be heard. Not every comment need be a complaint. But if enough call and say we want the telecom's feet held to the fire, that they can't spy on us with immunity and get away with it, it is a confirmation that they are now going in the right direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. From the other thread:
* No retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies that cooperated with the administration’s warrantless surveillance

Looks like it's covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Op is specifically saying not to give past immunity to telecoms. They already gave them
future immunity in August!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. From the other thread:
"* No retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies that cooperated with the administration’s warrantless surveillance"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. This is currently being "negotiated". It's important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Right
and because dems are putting in things his majesty will object to, Greenwald suggests it may get vetoed. Therefore it's still very much on the drawing board and we have time to yelp our heads off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Most important thread today.
I never realized we'd have to fight the Democrats in Congress as hard as we fought the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. you said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. It Is A Brain Freeze
isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. Link to Social Security thread
I did a search to find a current OP (which I had somehow missed) about Rahm Emanuel's Social Security sellout plan. Thought I could save others the trouble by sharing this link to it:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=1992157

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Excellent
Thanks. I saw it several days ago and it started me steaming. I tried calling yesterday only to realize they were off for Columbus Day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. I just read that whole thread and was left with this thought:
If this scheme is not going to replace all or part of Social Security now or in the future, then why is it that it needs to be part of Social Security legislation? Wouldn't it be more appropriate to augment existing 401(k) measures and leave Social Security out of it if there is no underlying sinister intent? Try suggesting that to proponents of this 'grand bargain' and see how enthusiastic they are about the idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. A Point To Consider, That There May Be Bait & Switch Going On Here
You unsubtly know, having read the other thread, that SS is an insurance plan, yet in recent years they have been trying to sell it as a savings plan. The argument is that investing in a better savings plan, with a greater yield, will heap regards for the beneficiaries. Unless of course the plans go under. And naturally when such things happen, those at the top cash out, as with Countrywide, just before the entity hits bottom. This private savings business is propaganda, pure and simple, designed to benefit wall street at our expense.

Also, I have to say that anything that Rahm (corporatist supreme and ardent DLCer) tries to mess with sends out a huge warning signal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Mighty fine point.
And as I suppose you must be aware, all this propaganda is designed to convince people that the general fund should not/can not/must not pay off the treasury bonds that are held by the SS trust fund. What a retroactive coup that would be for the wealthy elite! It is this that the GOP really sees as the SS 'chrisis'. They are in mortal fear that the treasury fund bonds will come due, and will have to be paid by non-regressive tax dollars.

All else is well-funded bullshit.

Lasher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Nail On Head Here
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 06:39 PM by Me.
Actually, the elites have a number of reasons to be afraid. I wonder if their dreams are haunted by the sound of pitchforks being sharpened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Assume the wurst;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. As In Knock-
(Them On The Head) - Wurst?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. Oh, I'm sure she's listening.
:sarcasm:

No offense to you, Me (lol).This is still a good idea.I'm just sick of calling and cajoling just to have it fall on her deaf ears. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I Hear You (Me.)
Hope springs eternal, squeaky wheel and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. We're damn near the squeakiest wheel in history.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. done! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Excellent Point About Thompson
We need to keep our eye on the little rst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. thanks for an arresting mental image!
You do know how to get people's attention!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. Nancy does not listen to us
I thought that was very apparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC