RadicalTexan
(607 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-13-08 10:15 PM
Original message |
I am a Dawkinsian atheist, and I find McFailin's demonization of Muslims as un-American despicable. |
dchill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-13-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I don't know what a Dawkinsian is... |
|
but I agree with you. (I'm an agnostic, so it makes sense that I don't know.) :)
|
Poll_Blind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-13-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Dawkinsian, from Richard Dawkins. |
RadicalTexan
(607 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-13-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. I am an atheist in the mold of Richard Dawkins |
|
i.e. I think religion is mostly bad for humanity, and I think it should be open for public criticism, like any other topic.
But I don't think one's religiosity or lack thereof has any bearing on one's American-ness. The only thing that matters is the Constitution. If you support the Constitution, you're an American, period. And people have the right to believe whatever the fuck they want, as long as they don't try to harm others.
This scapegoating of my fellow - Muslim - Americans sickens me. Palin's the anti-American one.
|
dchill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-13-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. OK, I understand that, too... |
|
It's the "selfish gene" stuff I get when I Google "Dawkinsian" that I evidently don't get. I agree with this post, too.
|
Poll_Blind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-13-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Pretty much same here and also upset. I'm glad Olbermann and Uygur have mentioned... |
|
...the "'Muslim' as opposite of 'Good Family Man'".
PB
|
RadicalTexan
(607 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-13-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. or "Arab" as opposite of "good family man" |
|
Fuck that shit. Especially coming from a serial adulterer and misogynist.
|
Incitatus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-13-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Dawkins is technically agnostic |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-13-08 10:38 PM by Incitatus
Richard Dawkins spectrum of probability as to the existence of God.
1. Strong theist. 100 per cent probability of God. In the words of C.G. Jung, 'I do not believe, I know
2. Very high probability but short of 100 per cent. De facto theist. 'I cannot know for certain, but I strongly believe in God and live my life on the assumption that he is there.'
3. Higher than 50 per cent but not very high. Technically agnostic but leaning towards theism. 'I am very uncertain, but I am inclined to believe in God.'
4. Lower than 50 per cent but not very low. Technically agnostic but leaning towards atheism. 'I do not know whether God exists but I'm inclined to be sceptical.'
5. Lower than 50 per cent but not very low. Technically agnostic but leaning towards atheism. 'I do not know whether God exists but I'm inclined to be sceptical.'
6. Very low probability, but short of zero. De facto atheist. 'I cannot know for certain but I think God is very improbable, and I live my life on the assumption that he is not there.'
7. Strong atheist. 'I know there is no God, with the same conviction as Jung "knows" there is one.'
Dawkins notes that he would be "surprised to meet many people in category 7". Dawkins calls himself "about a 6.8."
|
RadicalTexan
(607 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. He also thinks it's important to use the term "atheist" to lessen our stigma |
|
He encourages us to "come out."
|
upi402
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-13-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Republicans: unChristian and unAmerican |
|
unEthical... hell, unEverything true and good.
|
vixengrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-13-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I'm an atheist who has read Dawkins, and while I don't think |
|
he has much to do with it, I don't think McCain or Palin should use their claims to Christian faith to allege they are better than anyone, or to demonize Muslims. They have shown the limits of their intelligence via their campaign positions, and hating on Muslims adds little to nothing to what they offer. I think they offer irresponsible foreign policy and a misunderstanding of what separation of church and state should really mean. But I understand these beliefs have sometimes been se as radical, even when I hold them.
|
deaniac21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-14-08 09:04 AM
Response to Original message |
11. I'm an Anarco-Syndicalist. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:40 PM
Response to Original message |