nxylas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-20-10 07:25 AM
Original message |
Passenger trains: our hope for a more sustainable future |
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-20-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message |
1. It really is a miracle Amtrak has lasted....given all the anti-Amtrak legislators. |
nxylas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-20-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
At least that's what I'm going to start telling Republican fundies. It's sure to confuse them, given that most of them think public transportation is a socialist plot.
|
txlibdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-10 09:44 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Seriously. What a train system we could have if passenger rail got subsidized like airports do |
|
Man, oh man.
I happen to prefer a variant called Personal Rapid Transit, which uses small cars suitable for 1 to 4 people and picks you up at your starting point and drops you off at your destination. The vehicles are smaller and lighter so the track is much much cheaper per mile. There can be as many stations as you like and they do not slow down others because the stations are off line, so a car destined to stop at a particular station takes an exit track and then slows down to stop at that station, while other cars whose destinations are farther down the line do not even have to slow down.
Stations can be built cheaply as well because the size and weight are a fraction of light rail. Stations can be built directly attached to the mall, hospitals, schools, businesses, etc., so passengers enjoy the convenience of being able to enter and exit the car inside a heated or air conditioned space, not exposed to the weather extremes outside.
PRT is the best way forward because of its low cost, convenience, and passenger safety and comfort.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 01:58 AM
Response to Original message |