Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So isn't it bad news that Herman Cain is toast?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 07:37 PM
Original message
So isn't it bad news that Herman Cain is toast?
Wouldn't we rather run against this guy? Maybe we can ignore the story and hope he still wins the nomination. Or is he toast? Republicans are not normal humans they may actually like this shit. What do you guys think?

Not that Obama can't beat Romney but still Cain is a pretty weak yahoo ... we couldn't hope for much better really. But I think his inability to keep his sexual thoughts to himself has finished this $9.99 pizza guy.
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, I'd rather have Cain (and Michelle and other 'minor' players) on the scene longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is he actually "toast"?
My guess is that this is going to effect him minimally if at all. Wait for the next poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No just waffling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
unapatriciated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
31. according to the polls - he's on a roll
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Knight Hawk Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. Yes
You are correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. The right wing likes him, his poll numbers are still high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yeah - it is hard to predict them they don't think like normal people...
This could actually help him with these idiots. They may see him as a victim of feminism. The right is reptilian in mindset. Woops - sorry lizards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. The republicans don't want to win.
The iceberg is in sight, they don't want to be at the helm when we hit it. Best let the Democrat take the fall, then man the 2016 lifeboats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yeah I agree - kinda like Dole in '96
But then again I don't know that 2016 will be a disaster for the Dems. Things will be exceptionally weird by then and so it is hard to predict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
27. No way one party wins three elections in a row these days
2016 is a sure loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #27
43. What was Pappa Bush's win in 1988, chopped liver? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
36. That is Machiavellian!
I don't give them credit for strategic thinking at that high level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. If he IS toast, which I doubt, PERRY will be back and possibly get Cain's supporters,
and Obama can easily beat Perry, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. you are SO funny. I laughed out loud when I read this nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. The longer they all stay in the better as they'll keep beating up on each other
Making the eventual nominee weak. Plus, I think it the nominee were Cain, republican heads would explode as they came to realize that no matter who won, a Black man was going to be in the Oval Office for another 4 years... and with the head explosions making them ineligible to vote, there would be less republican voters, and Obama would win re-election.

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Except that Romney seems to have knit himself a little Mitt cocoon.
They guy just shifts his sails to the wind and moves along. What a dude.... If Cain's numbers go up as result of the scandal then Mitt will have one too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. It doesn't matter.
He was never going to get the GOP nomination. It will be Mitt or Perry and the take down ad on Romney I saw today was brutal and devastating.Kudos to whoever put it together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. He's just a side show. It's fun watching the Rs run wildly from one single-digit candidate
to another, but there's no way most of the runners have any chance. Cain wasn't going to be the nominee anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. No, I don't want him to be the nominee.
Any Republican nominee has about a 50/50 chance of being elected -- no matter how bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. If We Can't Beat A Flake Like Cain We LITERALLY Need To Find Another Country
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Elections get stolen for flakes
Just see Bush 2000 and Bush 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. They Have To Make It Close Enough First
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. He can't beat Obama fairly, but that's not what I'm talking about. If they succeed
in suppressing enough Obama votes, they can put any candidate they want into office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. The religious right and the tea baggers will stay home, they can not vote for Romney
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. He was never going to be the candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. "Republicans are not normal humans, they may actually like this shit."
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. Sexual matters have lost their luster
Bill Clinton's re-election proves that beyond any shadow of doubt. Unless any sex involved poses security risk, the public is agitated much less over it now.

What will sink Cain is his ineptness, not any sexual innuendo's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I Don't Think The Public Will Tolerate A Sexual Predator As POTUS
Edited on Thu Nov-03-11 06:50 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
That's a bit different than saying adultery is no longer a political career killer if it ever was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. What do you call Paula Jones accusations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. They Impeached Bill Clinton For It Or The Poison Fruit That Came From That Case, Didn't They?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. The point I was making is...again...
Bill Clinton won re-election, in spite of the several bimbo eruptions. I have to believe asking a person working under you for a blow job is a pretty serious abuse. But I think Americans pay more attention to issues which affect their lives, rather than she said he said stories involving sexual matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. The sex scandals
except for Gennifer Flowers, came in Clinton's second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Monica Lewinsky chronology
November 1995 Lewinsky and President Bill Clinton begin a sexual relationship, according to audiotapes secretly recorded later by Linda Tripp.

December 1995 Lewinsky moves into a paid position in the Office of Legislative Affairs, handling letters from members of Congress. She frequently ferries mail to the Oval Office.

April 1996 ThenDeputy White House Chief of Staff Evelyn Lieberman transfers Lewinsky to a job as an assistant to Pentagon spokesman Ken Bacon. Lieberman told The New York Times the move was due to inappropriate and immature behavior and inattention to work. At the Pentagon, Lewinsky meets Tripp, a career government worker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. But The Affair Wasn't Revealed Until Clinton's Second Term
Let Herman Cain become president and produce the longest economic expansion in the history of the republic and then we can have a discussion of what his peccadilloes are and if we can overlook them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #33
39. Sexual Harassment Is Very Real And Should Be Punished
A person shouldn't be asking his subordinates for sexual favors; even the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. Then why is the big dog so popular?
He got to serve 2 full terms, gets secret service protection for life, gets lifetime pension, gets money to maintain a office at home, and is a honored guest every where he goes, and makes huge money for speeches. Where is the punishment you are so adamant about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #29
44. There were accusations against Clinton during the 1992 campaign. He denied them
just like Cain is doing now. There is hypocrisy all around on this. Some of the people who weren't concerned about the accusations about Clinton are suddenly all concerned about Cain. And many Republicans who screamed bloody murder about Clinton don't seem too concerned about Cain. Actually, I am sick of the hypocrisy on both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
23. Sexual peccadilloes.
Considering the Republican base, it might work to his advantage. Something to take their minds off the fact that he's black. The base can segue to the "high tech lynching" meme and still get their victimization fix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
28. I have yet to see the candidate that can challenge President Obama.
He's done a really impressive thing, which is to set the gold standard for reality in an age where deception is the coin of the realm.

While the Republicans pile out of the clown car every couple of weeks and desperately try to improve their individual lots through "perception management," the President is busy telling everyone how it is, and he resonates with the people because that is how it is, for them.

There is no Republican candidate who is not dangerously flawed, manifestly unqualified, criminally inclined, or clouded by religious zealotry. At least one of them is all of those things.

Herman Cain is the cuspidor of this race, the vessel others can spit upon to prove their... spitability. He's the sad Indian that all the kids dump their drinks on in a Bobby/Annette beach-blanket-twist-movie, a scapegoat.

Cain seems to be happy to take that to the bank, which appears to have been his intent from the beginning since he still has no national campaign structure and a single talking point (which was one more than anyone else). As soon as he showed signs of pulling ahead, the others moved to spike him.

There's no point in our surreptitiously supporting him; it would only endanger him personally. So I say let him be the punching bag and let's see what it gets the rest of those jackals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
32. Did anyone think Cain would really get the nomination?
I always saw him as a flash in the pan, built up by the bored media. It really is Romney vs Perry and neither have tons of excitement behind them. And all the Republicans make Obama look very much like the only adult in the room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
38. He's being turned into another Conservative marter/victim... which means he'll never really go away.
More books, speeches, continual TV/Radio appearances...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
40. Cain with his Godfather pizza resume was never going to win the nom either way.
The issue only affects the race in how the timing of Cain's exit influences whether Romney, Perry, or someone else gets the nomination. It was never going to be Cain even without this harassment scandal.

I only hope that the fallout from this hurts his ability to get income from the wingnuts after he quits the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC