Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times: Students Lose Zeal for Aiding Obama Again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 11:49 AM
Original message
NY Times: Students Lose Zeal for Aiding Obama Again
Edited on Tue Nov-15-11 11:51 AM by alp227
For much of the presidential election of 2008, Barack Obama’s campaign was Emma Guerrero’s life. She was one of a dozen volunteers who showed up at an Obama campaign office here every night, taking time from her studies at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, to be part of what she still remembers as the most exciting period of her life.

It was largely because of Ms. Guerrero — and hundreds of other college students like her across the country — that Mr. Obama assembled a formidable machine that helped him roll to victory in 2008, a triumph that included putting Nevada into the Democratic column for the first time in 12 years.

“We did everything,” she said. “We went canvassing. Phone banking. Cleaning the offices. Taking out my bosses’ dry cleaning. Whatever they needed. It was such an amazing time because we all believed and wanted him to get elected.”

Ms. Guerrero said that she did not blame Mr. Obama for the 13.4 percent unemployment rate that has gripped this state, and that she was still likely to vote for him. But as she looks to graduation this June and her job hunt ahead, the emotion she feels is fear, and she cannot imagine having the time or spirit to work for Mr. Obama.

full: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/15/us/politics/students-lose-enthusiasm-to-fight-for-obama-again.html?pagewanted=all

As a college student I will never miss an election and will vote for Obama unless he commits the unspeakable sin of cutting social security/medicare or caves too much to those in Congress who want him to be a one-term president.

Meanwhile, some young folks disappointed by Obama are joining the Ron Paul cult because they feel that government is a failure AND their K-12 education has been scrubbed of labor history (because "THAT'S SOCIALIST!") and real civics thanks to the efforts of William Bennett and then No Child Left Behind. There's this book by conservative Jason Mattera, Obama Zombies, that argues that the Obama campaign used deceit to attract the under-30 vote.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. "By Adam Naguourney..."
:boring:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Thanks for the context
says it all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Really does!
My 23yr old daughter knows what's going on, says everyone w a brain does, but recognizes not everyone has a brain. Was very pleased to hear her p.o.v.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. A lot of people writing the *news* seem to live in their own "reality bubble"
Edited on Tue Nov-15-11 02:55 PM by Proud Liberal Dem
where they get these kind of ideas. Sure, anybody can pull one or two disaffected Obama supporters out of their hat but one or two people do not necessarily reflect the views of the majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
41. It's too early. Once the Puke Primaries are over and they have a "candidate"
...once the general campaign is underway, they'll change their minds and get busy when they realize what's at stake.

I teach political science college students, and even THEY aren't attuned to this election yet. They have midterms. They have life. They DO have a life!

When the election season gets rolling around, I think people will pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #41
53. Yes, they do have a life!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #41
82. I personally think the stduents were enegergized for several reasons in 2008
Palin scared the shit out of them....as did McCain.

They wanted to get rid of Republican rule.

Obama was inspirational, he inspired others to participate in and become part of the system, he offered a change from the established Republican ways, and offered hope for a different path.

This time around, they do NOT YET have those driving issues presented to them. I am thinking after the Primaries, the interest will peak yet again.


What makes my opinion of any less worth than the dribble opinion in the OP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. ...
:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. The best reason to vote for Obama is because of the republicans. Unfortunately, it isn't because of
progressive ideas

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Reality hit them.
Campaigning for the cool guy is not the same now that he has a record. Unemployment among the young is very high, the economy is still in the doldrums and college fees keep going up.

It is far easier to support a dream than the reality. It was bound to happen.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I give voting-age students more credit than that
Do you believe there will be a groundswell of support for Mitt der Shitt? The job-exporter and all-around corporate toady? Dream on! P.S.: Hillary Clinton is not running in 2012 - despite the most fervent efforts on the part of some to discredit our candidate by hook or by crook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. No, most won't vote Republican.
The question is, will as many young people vote as they did in 2008 or will they stay home? That's left to be seen.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Let's hope they stay home!!!! Cross your fingers!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Don't be foolish, that wasn't my point.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Union Scribe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #32
92. Oh they know that
Almost every time one of them twists someone's words they know what they're doing. The other ones have their fingers too far in their ears to type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. They were voting against Hillary.
and Obama was a cool guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. Platitudes do not produce jobs nor improve the economy.
Maybe they shouldn't have been so caught in the moment. Choosing a president should not be like choosing the American Idol.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. No, maybe they should have voted in 2010!

Why so many people don't realize that non-residential elections matter is beyond me. The jobs aren't there and our economy
is in poor shape because the repigs own the house. You should know better than that. Tsk, tsk.

It's still early and most people don't start volunteering at this stage. I'm sure the young voters will be out in full force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. I never said that they shouldn't have voted in 2010.
Unfortunately, many stayed home.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
44. Young
people are not known for high voter turn-out, couple that with a feeling of 'being had,' and it's more likely than not, that 2012 turn-out will be lower than 2008. Simple logic......

The only question is: how much lower?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
50. They should have gone with the New Coke approach like your candidate tried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Reality such as: "Barack Obama Can't Win, Bill." Both you and she were wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. Kitten, go spit a hairball elsewhere.
We are talking about whether young people will vote next year for Obama in as large a number as they did in 2008. This is not about the Clintons.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. "The cool guy"...
Aw...geez. Let it go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. I pounded on enough doors and made enough calls to know that they thought he was "cool".
Edited on Tue Nov-15-11 03:24 PM by Beacool
When you asked why they were supporting him, most would respond that he was for change. What kind of change? They didn't know or care. In 2008 it WAS cool to support Obama.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
47. What I want
to know is: Will he be coloring his hair before the election to look younger for the younger vote.........LOL........levity is good..............

I get a kick out of people saying he has aged a lot in 3 years. We all know it's just his hair hasn't been colored lately.......I just did mine today, it takes off 10 years.......LOL.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. I hadn't thought about that.
I don't think that he'll color it, but I guess it would be fun to see whether he does or not.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. Watch us both
get moved to the lounge.....LOL.......we just need some levity now and then, geez, people are getting more and more rude........the tension is getting pretty thick around here, lot's of nervous nellie's, and Hillary isn't even running..........LOL.......too bad, so sad.......

Did you hear Bill Clinton say: "negotiations need a mix of compromise and confrontation." I forgot which show it was on. Oops...I think that was a slap on you know who??

Long on the compromise, short on the confrontation.......maybe he was just trying to give Obama some good advice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. Apparently Bill IS giving the Obama campaign advice.
Axelrod and some of the campaign people came to NY to meet with Bill.

Oh, the irony of it all........

:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. The only thing ironic about that is the shitty job Bubba and Mark Penn did for HRC's campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #63
73. Tell that to Obama, he's the one that told his people to seek Bill's advice.
Can't have it both ways, dearie.

:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #73
76. Pfft. As if.
Edited on Wed Nov-16-11 12:35 AM by AtomicKitten
“The Obama team wants Bill Clinton on the reservation, actively helping them,” University of Virginia’s Larry Sabato said of the meeting. “Clinton has the potential to cause real problems if he believes he's on the outside looking in. He expects and wants to be involved, with appropriate deference, even though his relations with Obama have been shaky at best.”


I went dumpster-diving and found where your bullshit idea originated from. Not surprised you got it from http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Obama-Bill-Clinton-Advice/2011/11/15/id/418122 ">Newsmax. The O-team is humoring Bill Clinton because he can be such a narcissistic pain in the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #76
77. Ahhhh, the same arrogance as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #77
78. Exactly. Bill Clinton's arrogance makes him a loose cannon.
Edited on Wed Nov-16-11 01:05 AM by AtomicKitten
It's no coincidence that you are parroting the rightwing sources.

BClinton is clearly not the "best politician in many a generation" ...
Candidate Obama prevailed over the Clinton tag-team without breaking a sweat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #78
83. That is debatable.
Obama had a better campaign operation, but Bill is still the better politician.

As for arrogance, please, Obama reeks of it.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #59
71. Yes worked so well on Hillary's campaign
Oh wait! I wish Obama would see if Hillary would run for VP in 2012 to set her up for 2016. I like Joe, but Hillary would make it a sure win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #59
88. It really is too
bad they don't have a better relationship.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
64. Do you seriously think anybody here believes you lifted a finger for Obama?
As if. Sheeeeesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. She did lift a finger.
Edited on Tue Nov-15-11 10:01 PM by Starbucks Anarchist
In fact, it's still up. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #65
74. Oh, did you mean this finger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #74
80. You are hilarious.
:rofl:

Not that the latest manifestation of your bizarre obsession with Hillary losing fair and square deserves a response, but you can clearly see Obama is using two fingers to scratch his face. If you actually think Obama is dumb enough to flip off Hillary on live television, you should add "clueless" next to "bitter" in your profile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #80
84. Honey, I was being sarcastic.
Maybe if you stopped drinking the Kool-Aid long enough, you would have realized it.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. No, you weren't.
Every post of yours is at best a backhanded compliment to Obama or at worst, a full-on groundless attack, all tied back to Hillary losing. You are not fooling anybody.

And you are the LAST person to accuse anybody of being a Kool-Aid drinker. You latch onto Hillary (and Bill) like a creepy stalker. I have absolutely no doubt that you'd be happy to see Obama lose in 2012 because, unlike Hillary, you are still unable to get over it. Grow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #64
72. When did I say that I campaigned for Obama?
I was referring to the primaries, of course.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah,
“I don’t think so, no,” said Maureen Gregory, 23, a Las Vegas native who turned up at an interview at Madhouse Coffee loaded with buttons, T-shirts and posters from the campaign. “People in Nevada are really angry. I think Nevada is going to be red again in 2012, definitely.”

I'm sure they're all going to rush out and vote for one of the GOP clowns or stay home. Problem solved!

Everyone knows 2012 isn't going to be the same as 2008, but the notion that people who were really strong supporters of Obama in 2008 are going to allow a Republican to win is absurd. Everyone may not have the same level of enthusiasm, but that does not mean they're going to vote Republican.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Nevada WILL NOT be red in 2012.
As you stated, the enthusiasm is not the same but should not imply that people here have lost their minds or memory. We know which party wants to use us as a nuclear dump. We know which party would cripple our Unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Is that why Mark Amodei just won the Second Congressional District special election in a landslide?
I look for it to be very close with Las Vegas going blue and the rest of the state going red. Here in Elko County the GOP presidential candidate typically gets better than 70% of the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I know..the NRA's stooge.
:(

I hope history will repeat itself and Nevada will once again give Obama 6 EV's. We need a big turnout especially from minorities. At least Harry is safe until 2016.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onpatrol98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
66. True...
There simply is no other choice. There will be no credible primary challenger. The majority of democrats who vote, will vote for President Obama. Maybe without some of the starry eyed, tingle up the leg, adoration as before. This time it will be the stark reality of what the alternative choice would offer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. And the alternative? Hope these collegians are using their brains
In contrast to the "Sit it out" contingent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Me too
I understand their frustration with things (we're all experiencing it) but I hope that they understand what life will be like for them (and the rest of us) if the GOP gets the WH and Congress next year. :banghead: With Democrats in power, everybody will have a chance to succeed. With the Republicans in power, the 99% are just going to get screwed over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cigar11 Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bad Move
Be prepared to kiss the Department of Education and Low Interest Loans for Higher Education completely good-by forever; leaving only a fraction of the US population access to quality education if you leave it up to the GOP and the Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. great campaign strategy
he sucks, but these folk suck worse!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well I'm sure some are turned off, but when the Obama office opened here in Madison
recently there were lots of student volunteers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why should I listen to the MSM when their intent is to create doom and gloom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. yeah, it's all the media's fault
:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. What a strange attempt to create negativity
A Presidential terms in four years, just like a college education. Therefore, Ms. Guerrero is graduating.

Incoming freshman might still have some energy.

And Ms. Guerrero is only one person.

People who write these things think we are stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. Go for it College kids. Your choice is Herman Cain or Bachmann...enjoy it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
48. More like Romney! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #48
81. Nope. Romney has no chance. In an Iowa poll it was Cain who was first.
And Paul came in second. Romney wasn't on the list. So far this sexual harassmet thing has turned into making Herman Cain a more well known figure than hurt his career. Romney hasn't a chance in high water. Even forgetting their positions seems to help them. Sure it hurts them with normal voters---but helps them with regular voters. Did you see Palin? She had notes in her hands, a blood libel comment that went viral with anger--and yet, if that woman put in her bid---she'd be the nominee hands down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #81
87. Not once did
I read a thread here on Palin. I never thought she had a chance at the nomination, and I don't like wasting time. Anyway, she's not running and I disagree she would get the nom. As far as Romney goes, I predicted from the beginning, he would get the nomination and still believe that.

Time will tell which one of us is correct, we'll talk later..............

I still have this feeling that someone will jump in at the end and prove both of us wrong..........LOL

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
26. NEGATIVITY CARD ALERT.........PSYOPS in Progress... this is a clue of BAD POLARITY
at work......

Obama Zombies My ASS

Try GOP DELUSION due to Hubristic Arrogance
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
30. 2012 will be my college son's first election ... he'll be voting for Obama.
He follows politics religiously, and he wonders why adults who voted for Obama thought that Obama would have the entire world fixed in 2 years or even in one term.

His take ... some of the college kids he knows have the political attention span of a Kardasian wedding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Sounds like you have a great son!
"and he wonders why adults who voted for Obama thought that Obama would have the entire world fixed in 2 years or even in one term."

I'm 25 and I really wonder that too...

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. I'm biased, but yes he is ...
Back before the 2008 elections, he was just becoming old enough to understand that a kid like him could be sent to war. And so he was drawn in to world affairs.

He was telling me about various things he'd read or seen on TV by the time he was a sophomore in HS.

Now that he is in college (in NC) he finds himself trying to explain this stuff to other students who clearly have no idea. He tells me about friends who spout right wing talking points ... his tactic in response, is to act unsure, but then bring up factual information that he "thinks" he has seen.

One of his favorites is that when a right wing friend claims Obama is "bad for business", my son asks, if that is true, why has the DOW gone from 7500 to 12k since Obama has been President. He says this point destroys the right wing guy's credibility on almost anything else they say.





Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #43
55. Pretty clever - Obama has been good for business.
What's his major?

I studied history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
34. First the Corporate media announced that the Gay Community had turned on Obama
Edited on Tue Nov-15-11 04:37 PM by FrenchieCat
Gay groups grumble over Obama
http://cachef.ft.com/cms/s/0/3ba1fca6-9918-11e0-acd2-00144feab49a.html#axzz1doDh702v

but that didn't work

LGBT Community Raising Big for Obama
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2011/10/lgbt-raising-big-for-barack-obama.html


Then they announced that Black Folks weren't "Enthusiastic" to vote for Obama in 2012.....

The Black War Over Obama
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/08/14/cornel-west-and-the-black-war-over-obama.html

and when that didn't work...
Poll: Black Americans more optimistic, enthused about 2012
http://www.thegrio.com/politics/poll-black-americans-more-optimistic-enthused-about-2012.php



Then they tried to put out some stories about Obama and women, and his administration....

The WH 'a genuinely hostile workplace for women'
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/63737.html#ixzz1doFwITnw

Losing Women: Obama Support Sinks to New Lows
http://townhall.com/columnists/carrielukas/2011/09/06/losing_women__obama_support_sinks_to_new_lows/page/full/

and then that didn't work....

Women Voters Buoy Obama’s 2012 Hopes
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/11/women-voters-buoy-obamas-2012-hopes/



Then they tried to put out some stories about Obama and Hispanics, and how they were dismayed with him,

Obama’s Hispanic Vote Slipping Away
http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/17/obama%E2%80%99s-hispanic-vote-slipping-away/

and that didn't work....

New Poll Puts Obama Far Ahead of GOP With Latino Voters
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/11/new-poll-puts-obama-far-ahead-of-gop-with-latino-voters/


And that reminds me about the Jewish vote.....
same story....

More Bad News for Obama and the Left on the Jewish Vote
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/09/26/obama-jewish-opinion-decline-romney/

But that's not going to work, it appears.....

GOP ruins chance to grab Jewish vote
http://whatreallyhappened.com/content/gop-ruins-chance-grab-jewish-vote

Jewish Vote Not A 'Problem' For Obama, Polls Show
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x816645


Then they went for the environmentalists,
Ozone climbdown: Is Obama giving up on environment?
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2011/09/ozone-climbdown-is-obama-back-.html

and well, that's not gonna happen either....


Obama's Keystone Pipeline Delay Could Shore Up Green Support
http://www.wnyc.org/npr_articles/2011/nov/10/obamas-keystone-pipeline-delay-could-shore-up-green-support/


so then, desperation struck, and the question was asked....:scared:

Could Obama lose Arab-American voters over Israel?
http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/obama_arab_american_vote/
and that didn't quite work....



SO OF COURSE, YOUNG PEOPLE WOULD BE NEXT...... :shrug:

At the end of the day, combining these constant hit jobs from the media
using like tools those who would spread the bullshit everywhere....
along with curbing voting in state after state after state....
Well some folks may just get what they dreamed off.....Republican feet
deep up in their asses for a long ass time! Wouldn't that be simply
wonderful for all Americans, and for the world? So I hope folks keep working hard on this....
cause I'm one for enjoying those who most deserve it getting their just deserts. Too bad
it will be at everyone's expense.....but after all, a few bad apple can make life really difficult
for us all.




Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Frenchie, you are the best. Your post should be it's own o.p. to counter this swill.
Thanks for your research. What I don't get is why we're playing along with the M$M's attempts to marginalize this president on a board called "Democratic" Underground? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #34
45. Wait, does that say that gay bundlers raised $56 MILLION??! As in... MILLION??
Good LORD, that's alot of dough!! Holy moly... :wow: :wow: Do you have any numbers on how much money other groups have raised for his reelection?

That's nearly 5 percent of the money all of Obama's bundlers have raised.

That is really amazing.

As for the Jewish vote, Koch in NY seems to be doing his part to make things a bit more difficult for the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #34
46. You go girl!
Spectacular post.
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #34
57. Busted!! Great post FrenchieCat!

Bookmarked just for your post. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #34
68. "announced that the Gay Community had turned on Obama"
Translation: "sit down and shut up, we can win without you?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. Not a translation, although it must be what you're thinking.....
fortunately for this world, not all folks think exactly alike!
That's a relief, wouldn't you say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
chavi Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #34
70. Yep, that sums it up perfectly!
Great post FrenchieCat!
Wish we could rec. individual posts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #34
89. I would have left this whole thing alone if not for you, thx for your input
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #34
91. And all of that happened BEFORE lunch time!
:rofl:
rockivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
37. Can't be true. All those kids were haters anyway.
Besides you can't trust the Times. Oh, and we've got this list. Hey. Look over there. Uh. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. Blah blah blah.
You forgot "hero worship."

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #49
85. pithy
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #37
52. Funny, but pretty accurate..........
:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. Still bitter, huh? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. Still swallowing the swill?
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
40. Oh noes!!!!!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
58. You can't compare '08 to now.
At this point 4 years ago, there was an unknown Democratic primary on the brink ... a phenomenon that always attracts tons of interest and feet on the ground. Then that primary stretched out all the way to the late spring/early summer of '08, creating more impetus for people to become interested and involved.

Then there was the general election after eight years of pent-up anger about the Bush administration and a determination to not let the Republicans hold that seat again. Huge impetus for involvement.

This time, there is no primary question. The candidate is not some unknown long-shot who needs all the help he can get to fend off the Republican menace. He's the President of the United States of America. So I can see why young folk (and even not so young) are not "fired up and ready to go" at this point. That may change by next summer, or perhaps not even until Labor Day, when there is a real opponent and a real race.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
61. So they'll shoot themselves in the heart by re-electing the assholes who GOT
us into this mess?

If so, this country is going to get exactly what it deserves.


Collapse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
62. I don't know how enthusiastic students will be,
but if they are enthusiastic, then I fear for our future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
75. I don't always agree with President Obama's decisions...
...but he's done a decent job overall.

I will be voting for him. Probably won't have time to volunteer, but I can vote.

If the choice is between...

a: whichever lunatic and/or crook the Republicans eventually make presentable enough to run
b: sitting at home and wasting my vote
c: voting for someone who won't win the election
d: someone who (while not perfect) has at least made an effort on my behalf, and on my friends' behalf

...I'm voting D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
79. What a shock.
Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
90. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC