You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #154: Thanks for the mathematical figures [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #153
154. Thanks for the mathematical figures
But I think we would have to use the distance shown by the hypoteneuse of the triangle formed by the airplane, fixed ground point (laser), and moving ground point immediately under the plane, rather than the distance between the ground and the plane. That would mean even greater divergence for your hypothetical laser beam, but the diameter of the beam would still be so small that the plane, at 250 knots/hour, would pass through the beam instantaneously and, as you noted, the beam would hardly be intensive enough at that distance to cause problems for a pilot's eye.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC