You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: Exactly right!.....this is a far more probable 'October Surprise' [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Exactly right!.....this is a far more probable 'October Surprise'
I honestly think OBL is not amongst the living. I think he was probably dead around the time of Bush saying (almost exactly 6 months after 9/11) "Who cares if OBL is dead or alive. He's not a priority." Kidney failure, most likely. (BTW: What was the official testimony to the 9/11 commission regarding the CIA station chief meeting OBL in August? ) I suspect that OBL is in the bin Laden family plot somewhere in SA. Another "deal" dealt to a Carysle Partner.

But OBL is probably more important "missing" to Bush....it gives a virtual face (what a face) to our War on Terror (WOT) or Waste of Treasury, depending on your perspective. Bush's mantra these days is: "OBL did 9/11, we can't find him, so be very afraid they'll be another terror attack before November. But don't forget that Bush has made us more secure since 9/11."

9/11 happened because they wanted an attack. I think they did their best to stonewall intel in CIA/FBI at a level where they could maintain denial of pre-knowledge. People who were in a position to connect dots and send it up the channel....didn't. And they get promoted in the organization. Frasca/FBI? I'm sure there are others.

The point here is that this administration is good at not reacting and getting corporate media to play along. So would they react to pre-knowledge of a huge Iraqi sneak attack? They are on record that another attack will occur. But will it be here or in Iraq? Should an attack occur, I have no doubt that they will be prepared to exploit it as much as possible. They will also get a sympathetic Corporate Media to frame the war in most extreme nationalistic and dire rhetoric --> and use this message to reinforce our "wartime" pResident....draft, more troops, more discord in the world. Meanwhile, the price of oil increases.

Seems that this administration is quite capable of manipulating intel to suite their political needs between now and November. Their mounting legal problems could provide the motivation, as well. They could just as easily allow an attack against the troops to jumpstart their Pax Americana. These are indeed dangerous times.....




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC