You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #106: Right. Stick with Booze and Nicotine, Kids.. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-04 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
106. Right. Stick with Booze and Nicotine, Kids..
They're good for ya!

Oh, and be sure to take lots of those overpriced pharmaceutical company anti-depressants, you know, the ones that turn you into a sexless zombie ready for 8 hours a day of mind-numbing, corporate dronedom! They're Grrrrreat! And, they only cost $40 a pill!

Schizophrenia, as I understand it (watch, now some asshat is going to ask me to provide written verification of having studied this, too) doesn't generally manifest itself until late teens or early twenties, in most people. Most people who smoke pot start before then. This study acknowledges that these effects seem to happen in people with a predisposition to schizophrenia. Therefore, it's hardly arguable that pot is "making" anyone schizophrenic. Other than that, legalize it, tax it, and use the money from the taxes to help treat mental illess, which is grossly under-funded in this country. I can't imagine that schizophrenics who smoke pot are helped by the gummint turning them into criminals and throwing them into jail. Where's the study that says countries like the Netherlands, which have a more tolerant, harm reduction approach to drugs, have more schizophrenics running around?

Beyond that, I'm not sure what the point of this piece is. Yes, schizophrenics and those with predispositions thereof, probably shouldn't mess around with certain chemicals.. just like alcoholics shouldn't drink. Does that mean that the chemical itself is "evil", or that the millions of people who use it responsibly are "wrong"? Hardly, I think.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC