You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #295: Yeah, I think the REAL point is NOT whether we can positively prove [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
295. Yeah, I think the REAL point is NOT whether we can positively prove
that Gannon is Gosch. But that Gannon most likely was victimized in essentially the same way as Gosch...as a child sex slave to the Power Elite in D.C. The fact that Gannon seems to have little or no traceable friends, no military record, only ONE person from his high school/college who's come forward to say he even knew OF Gannon... despite the fact that Gannon was a class officer and active in SEVERAL class clubs/organizations.

Gannon's "military men" sex websites are a fact. Yet military recordes say Gannon was never in the military. The fact that Gannon got such "close" and "cordial" access to both the President and Scotty at Press Conferences WITHOUT any real journalistic background, leaves little room for doubt that Gannon's "familiarity" with higher-up's in the WH were his "ticket" in the West Wing door. Plus the irrepressible "sparkle" in both Scotty and Shrub's eyes when they addressed Gannon spoke "volumes." Scotty's given A LOT of press conferences, and I don't ever recall seeing that much "spark" or "emotion" when he called on a reporter before.

There is clearly something here far more than a schill planted in the newsroom to parrot back Repug talking points. And I don't think we should let it drop. The "Gannon Threads" SHOULD continue. Unless of course we want to continue "Pope" and "Schiavo" threads ad infinitum. Which would please M.S.M. and the Admin. greatly.

Yet we are NOT M.S.M., so let's do what we do best...brain-storm. So what if our tin foil rattles at times. We're onto something BIG. Let's not let it drop.

Gannon had lots of "inside" "advance" knowledge of major news events that no one else had ("Plame"...911...). How? From whom? And in what "position" did he hear these "leaks?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC